Effect of Pulmonary Hypertension on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Khalil, Sulafa [1 ]
Tabowei, Godfrey [2 ]
Kaur, Mandeep [3 ]
Dadzie, Samuel K. [4 ]
Kansakar, Sajog [5 ]
Moqattash, Merid [6 ]
Komminni, Praveen Kumar [7 ]
Palleti, Sujith K. [8 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Pediat, Doha, Qatar
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Internal Med, Odessa, TX USA
[3] HCA Capital Hosp, Internal Med, Tallahassee, FL USA
[4] Piedmont Athens Reg Med Ctr, Internal Med, Athens, GA USA
[5] Miamonides Med Ctr, Internal Med, Brooklyn, NY USA
[6] Univ Pecs, Med, Med Sch, Pecs, Hungary
[7] Suraksha Hosp, Internal Med, Khammam, India
[8] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Nephrol, Shreveport, LA 71115 USA
关键词
systematic review and meta analysis; cardiovascular mortality; all-cause mortality; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; pulmonary hypertension; STENOSIS; IMPACT; IMPLANTATION; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.58540
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on survival in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2015, to March 10, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this metaanalysis included early and late all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Total 15 studies were integrated into the pooled analysis to assess the impact of PH on outcomes among patients undergoing TAVR, comprising a total sample size of 35,732 individuals. The pooled prevalence of PH stood at 52.57% (n=18,767). Predominantly, the studies were conducted in the United States (n=6), followed by Germany (n=3), with one study each from Japan, Italy, Switzerland, Brazil, Poland, and Australia. Pooled analysis showed that risk of short-term mortality was greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (risk ratio (RR): 1.46, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.80). Risk of long-term mortality was greater in patients with PH (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.55). Risk of cardiovascular mortality was also greater in patients with PH compared to patients without PH (RR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.36 to 2.02). We advocate for further research to address gaps in understanding different types of PH and their impacts on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Yan
    Du, Yu
    Fu, Mingjie
    Ma, Yue
    Wang, Deguang
    Zhang, Jinglin
    Liu, Wei
    Zhao, Yingxin
    Zhou, Yujie
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [2] Malnutrition Predicts Adverse Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dong, Mingqi
    Cheng, Jifang
    Gong, Li
    Xiao, Yajing
    Shao, Shengwen
    Song, Jianping
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 27 (05): : 240 - 248
  • [3] Anaemia and mortality in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kanjanahattakij, Napatt
    Rattanawong, Pattara
    Krishnamoorthy, Parasuram
    Sirinvaravong, Natee
    Chongsathidkiet, Pakawat
    Lapumnuaypol, Kamolyut
    George, Jon C.
    Witzke, Christian
    Figueredo, Vincent M.
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2019, 74 (05) : 386 - 392
  • [4] Procedural and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Cheng-Hao Jacky
    Jiang, Henry
    Martin, Owen
    Wilson-Smith, Ashley R.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 11 (04) : 351 - +
  • [5] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in mixed aortic valve disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guddeti, Raviteja R.
    Gill, Gauravpal S.
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Alla, Venkata Mahesh
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2022, 8 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [6] Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kanjanahattakij, Napatt
    Horn, Benjamin
    Vutthikraivit, Wasawat
    Biso, Sylvia Marie
    Ziccardi, Mary Rodriguez
    Lu, Marvin Louis Roy
    Rattanawong, Pattara
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (07) : 896 - 902
  • [7] Aortic valve replacement with pulmonary hypertension: Meta-analysis of 70 676 patients
    Rocha, Rodolfo V.
    Friedrich, Jan O.
    Hong, Kathryn
    Lee, Jessica
    Cheema, Asim
    Bagai, Akshay
    Verma, Subodh
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2019, 34 (12) : 1617 - 1625
  • [8] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ando, Tomo
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Holmes, Anthony A.
    Afonso, Luis
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Kondur, Ashok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 215 : 14 - 19
  • [9] Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kevin S.
    Makhdoum, Ahmad
    Koziarz, Alex
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Alsagheir, Ali
    Pandey, Arjun
    Reza, Seleman
    Um, Kevin
    Teoh, Kevin
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Lamy, Andre
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (12) : 4734 - 4742
  • [10] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Demir, Ozan M.
    Curio, Jonathan
    Pagnesi, Matteo
    Rahman, Haseeb
    Mitomo, Satoru
    Colombo, Antonio
    Chau, Mei
    Prendergast, Bernard
    Latib, Azeem
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (03): : E226 - +