Learning about structural errors in models of complex dynamical systems

被引:4
作者
Wu, Jin-Long [1 ,3 ]
Levine, Matthew E. [2 ,3 ]
Schneider, Tapio [3 ]
Stuart, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, 1513 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Broad Inst MIT & Harvard, Eric & Wendy Schmidt Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[3] CALTECH, 1200 E Calif Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model error; Dynamical system; Machine learning; Inverse problem; Stochastic model; Non-local model; STOCHASTIC CLIMATE MODELS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; ALGORITHM; INFERENCE; NOISY; IDENTIFICATION; APPROXIMATION; SIMULATIONS; CALIBRATION; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113157
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Complex dynamical systems are notoriously difficult to model because some degrees of freedom (e.g., small scales) may be computationally unresolvable or are incompletely understood, yet they are dynamically important. For example, the small scales of cloud dynamics and droplet formation are crucial for controlling climate, yet are unresolvable in global climate models. Semi-empirical closure models for the effects of unresolved degrees of freedom often exist and encode important domain-specific knowledge. Building on such closure models and correcting them through learning the structural errors can be an effective way of fusing data with domain knowledge. Here we describe a general approach, principles, and algorithms for learning about structural errors. Key to our approach is to include structural error models inside the models of complex systems, for example, in closure models for unresolved scales. The structural errors then map, usually nonlinearly, to observable data. As a result, however, mismatches between model output and data are only indirectly informative about structural errors, due to a lack of labeled pairs of inputs and outputs of structural error models. Additionally, derivatives of the model may not exist or be readily available. We discuss how structural error models can be learned from indirect data with derivative-free Kalman inversion algorithms and variants, how sparsity constraints enforce a "do no harm" principle, and various ways of modeling structural errors. We also discuss the merits of using non -local and/or stochastic error models. In addition, we demonstrate how data assimilation techniques can assist the learning about structural errors in non-ergodic systems. The concepts and algorithms are illustrated in two numerical examples based on the Lorenz -96 system and a human glucose-insulin model.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Drift Estimation of Multiscale Diffusions Based on Filtered Data
    Abdulle, Assyr
    Garegnani, Giacomo
    Pavliotis, Grigorios A.
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    Zanoni, Andrea
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 2023, 23 (01) : 33 - 84
  • [2] Ensemble Kalman methods with constraints
    Albers, David J.
    Blancquart, Paul-Adrien
    Levine, Matthew E.
    Seylabi, Elnaz Esmaeilzadeh
    Stuart, Andrew
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2019, 35 (09)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Statistical analysis with missing data
  • [4] Stochastic parametrizations and model uncertainty in the Lorenz '96 system
    Arnold, H. M.
    Moroz, I. M.
    Palmer, T. N.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2013, 371 (1991):
  • [5] Approximate Bayes learning of stochastic differential equations
    Batz, Philipp
    Ruttor, Andreas
    Opper, Manfred
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2018, 98 (02)
  • [6] Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models
    Beck, Andrea
    Flad, David
    Munz, Claus-Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2019, 398
  • [7] Enforcing Analytic Constraints in Neural Networks Emulating Physical Systems
    Beucler, Tom
    Pritchard, Michael
    Rasp, Stephan
    Ott, Jordan
    Baldi, Pierre
    Gentine, Pierre
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2021, 126 (09)
  • [8] Data assimilation as a learning tool to infer ordinary differential equation representations of dynamical models
    Bocquet, Marc
    Brajard, Julien
    Carrassi, Alberto
    Bertino, Laurent
    [J]. NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 26 (03) : 143 - 162
  • [9] LARGE-SCALE SPARSE INVERSE COVARIANCE MATRIX ESTIMATION
    Bollhoefer, Matthias
    Eftekhari, Aryan
    Scheidegger, Simon
    Schenk, Olaf
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2019, 41 (01) : A380 - A401
  • [10] Sparse learning of stochastic dynamical equations
    Boninsegna, Lorenzo
    Nueske, Feliks
    Clementi, Cecilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 148 (24)