Greening the Belt and Road Initiative: Evidence from emergy evaluation of China's provincial trade with ASEAN countries

被引:1
|
作者
Tian, Xu [1 ]
Sarkis, Joseph [2 ]
Chen, Wei [3 ]
Geng, Yong [1 ]
Pan, Haozhi [4 ]
Liu, Zuoxi [5 ]
Ulgiati, Sergio [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, SJTU UNIDO Joint Inst Inclus & Sustainable Ind Dev, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[3] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[5] Shenyang Aerosp Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Key Lab Clean Energy Liaoning, Shenyang 110136, Peoples R China
[6] Parthenope Univ Napoli, Dept Sci & Technol, I-80143 Naples, Italy
[7] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
来源
FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH | 2024年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
International trade; Emergy; Belt and road initiative; Environmental sustainability; Province; SUSTAINABILITY EVALUATION; POWER; GEOBIOSPHERE; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fmre.2022.11.007
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a central policy within China's regional development and foreign trade strategy. Traditional trade has typically depended on economic valuation of resources, while the embedded environmental value is rarely considered. This situation exists in most BRI trade evaluations. To address BRI environmental sustainability issues, we consider the role of pivotal Chinese provinces and their key trade partners (ASEAN countries) as an illustration for the environmental value of resource exchanges. Emergy accounting is used as the valuation tool for a sample period of seventeen years. Key results include: (1) Emergy valuations show sustainability of sample provinces decreased over time; (2) ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam play significant resource roles for provincial economic systems; (3) Diverse trends in trade between pivotal provinces and ASEAN countries resulted in an unbalanced trade structure from trade. Policy implications are proposed to promote a more globally sustainable and fair trade using BRI as an established trade policy.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 393
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] China's Belt and Road Initiative and ASEAN
    Zhao Hong
    CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (02) : 127 - 147
  • [2] Does Political Risk Matter for China's Trade with ASEAN and MENA Countries? A Belt Road Initiative Perspective
    Goswami, Gour Gobinda
    Panthamit, Nisit
    CHINESE ECONOMY, 2022, 55 (03) : 188 - 207
  • [4] The impact of China's one belt one road initiative on international trade in the ASEAN region
    Foo, Nam
    Lean, Hooi Hooi
    Salim, Ruhul
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 54
  • [5] The Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia and Responses from ASEAN Countries
    Yuen, Kong Tuan
    CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (04) : 24 - 33
  • [6] The Belt and Road Initiative and China's Trade Development
    Tong, Sarah Y.
    Yi, Zheng
    CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (04) : 50 - 61
  • [7] The Role of International Engagement in Greening China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Gong, Weila
    Lewis, Joanna I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2023, 32 (07) : 1208 - 1230
  • [8] Greening China's Belt and Road Initiative: From Norm Localization to Norm Subsidiarity?
    Sun, Yixian
    Yu, Bowen
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2023, 23 (01) : 91 - 116
  • [9] Development of China-ASEAN Economic and Trade Relations under the Belt and Road Initiative
    Li Ruihua
    Hu Wenxiu
    China'sForeignTrade, 2021, (03) : 36 - 39
  • [10] Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains: New Evidence from China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Peng, Fei
    Kang, Lili
    Liu, Taoxiong
    Cheng, Jia
    Ren, Luxiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)