Impact of spiritual interventions in individuals with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Izgu, Nur [1 ]
Metin, Zehra Gok [1 ]
Eroglu, Hacer [2 ]
Semerci, Remziye [3 ]
Pars, Hatice [4 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Nursing, Internal Med Nursing Dept, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Lokman Hekim Univ, Healthcare Vocat Sch, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Koc Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Pediat Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Epidemiol MSc Program, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Cancer; Spiritual care; Spiritual well-being; Meta; -analysis; Nursing; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; BREAST-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; THERAPY; WOMEN; PSYCHOTHERAPY; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102646
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to determine how spiritual interventions affect cancer patients' physical, emotional, and spiritual outcomes and quality of life. Methods: Between 2012 and May 2024, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched considering the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Twenty-six randomized controlled trials were included, and 16 were synthesized in the meta-analysis. Bias risk was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias methodology for randomized studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was employed for evidence certainty. Heterogeneity was expressed through I-2 and Q statistics. Hedge's g was calculated for effect sizes. Egger's and Kendall's Tau were used for publication bias. Results: Spiritual interventions yielded beneficial effects on fatigue (Hedges's g = 0.900, p < 0.001) and pain (Hedges's g = 0.670, p < 0.001) but not for overall symptom burden (Hedges's g = 0.208, p = 0.176). Significant effects were found for anxiety (Hedges's g = 0.301, p < 0.001), depression (Hedges's g = 0.175, p = 0.016), and psychological distress (Hedges's g = 0.178, p = 0.024), except for hopelessness (Hedges's g = 0.144, p = 0.091). Spiritual interventions enhanced faith (Hedges's g = 0.232, p = 0.035), the meaning of life (Hedges's g = 0.259, p = 0.002), spiritual well-being (Hedges's g = 0.268, p < 0.001), and quality of life (Hedges's g = 245, p < 0.001). Moderator analysis pointed out that cancer stage, total duration, delivery format, providers' qualification, content, and conceptual base of spiritual interventions significantly affect physical, emotional, and spiritual outcomes and quality of life. Conclusion: This meta-analysis highlighted the benefits of spiritual interventions with varying effect sizes on patients' outcomes, as well as quality of life in cancer, and shed on how to incorporate these approaches into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [11] A randomised clinical trial of the effects of spiritually focused meditation for people with metastatic melanoma
    Cole, Brenda S.
    Hopkins, Clare M.
    Spiegel, Jon
    Tisak, John
    Agarwala, Sanjiv
    Kirkwood, John M.
    [J]. MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2012, 15 (02) : 161 - 174
  • [12] Complementary religious and spiritual interventions in physical health and quality of life: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials
    de Bernardin Goncalves, Juliane Piasseschi
    Lucchetti, Giancarlo
    Menezes, Paulo Rossi
    Vallada, Homero
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [13] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [14] Farahaninia M., 2018, Journal of ClientCentered Nursing Care, V4, P61
  • [15] Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence
    Gartlehner, Gerald
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Devane, Declan
    Kahwati, Leila
    Viswanathan, Meera
    King, Valerie J.
    Qaseem, Amir
    Akl, Elie
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Grp
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [16] Spiritual care interventions in nursing: an integrative literature review
    Ghorbani, Mojtaba
    Mohammadi, Eesa
    Aghabozorgi, Reza
    Ramezani, Monir
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (03) : 1165 - 1181
  • [17] Spiritual interventions for cancer pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Hindmarch, Thomas
    Dalrymple, James
    Smith, Matthew
    Barclay, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [18] The effect of spiritual therapy for improving the quality of life of women with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial
    Jafari, Najmeh
    Zamani, Ahmadreza
    Farajzadegan, Ziba
    Bahrami, Fatemeh
    Emami, Hamid
    Loghmani, Amir
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2013, 18 (01) : 56 - 69
  • [19] Julian P.T., 2019, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions-2019, DOI 10.1002/9781119536604
  • [20] Meaning-Centered Interventions for Patients With Advanced or Terminal Cancer A Meta-analysis
    Kang, Kyung-Ah
    Han, Suk-Jung
    Lim, Young-Sook
    Kim, Shin-Jeong
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2019, 42 (04) : 332 - 340