Collaboration in Innovation Systems: A Study in India

被引:0
作者
Pacheco, Carla [1 ]
Paul, Bino [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Inst Social Sci, Mumbai, India
来源
TRIPLE HELIX | 2024年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
collaboration; emerging markets; innovation systems; knowledge application; knowledge production; knowledge sharing; mixed methods; systems theory; social capital; triple helix; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; TRIPLE-HELIX; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SPECIAL-ISSUE; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1163/21971927-bja10039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The increased complexity in the current business environment connected with the globalisation of economies and rapid technological developments makes firms depend on innovation and, in the process, develop dense networks of relationships, making collaboration an essential requisite for innovation. Thus, collaboration develops based on complex social networks from which innovation emerges. From this perspective, collaboration takes a systematic approach, where social relationships are crucial. This article describes the innovation behaviour of firms operating in India and introduces collaboration as a system drawing from the systems theory and triple helix innovation model. The results of the mixed methods study conducted pointed toward a fragile collaboration framework. Triangulation was employed to provide a deeper understanding. Furthermore, limited understanding of collaboration as a social system has constrained social interactions, leading to limited knowledge production, application, and knowledge sharing, with technological development and innovation delays. The article lists crucial factors from the perspectives of industry and academia to foster a collaboration framework.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 290
页数:66
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [61] Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university-industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea
    Hemmert, Martin
    Bstieler, Ludwig
    Okamuro, Hiroyuki
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2014, 34 (10) : 605 - 616
  • [62] Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships
    Hertzfeld, Henry R.
    Link, Albert N.
    Vonortas, Nicholas S.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (06) : 825 - 838
  • [63] Hina S, 2016, 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES (ICCOINS), P564, DOI 10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783277
  • [64] Hollstein B, 2014, STRUC AN S, P3
  • [65] Hosmer DW Jr, 2013, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P89
  • [66] Hosmer DW, 2000, WILEY PS TX, Vsecond, P160, DOI 10.1002/0471722146
  • [67] Foreign and Domestic Collaboration, Product Innovation Novelty, and Firm Growth
    Hsieh, Wan-Lin
    Ganotakis, Panagiotis
    Kafouros, Mario
    Wang, Chengqi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 35 (04) : 652 - 672
  • [68] How does probability of innovation change with firm age?
    Huergo, E
    Jaumandreu, J
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (3-4) : 193 - 207
  • [69] Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice
    Ivankova, Nataliya V.
    Creswell, John W.
    Stick, Sheldon L.
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [70] Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards a theoretical understanding of innovation and entrepreneurship in India
    Jain, Sanjay
    Nair, Anil
    Ahlstrom, David
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 32 (04) : 835 - 841