Collaboration in Innovation Systems: A Study in India

被引:0
作者
Pacheco, Carla [1 ]
Paul, Bino [1 ]
机构
[1] Tata Inst Social Sci, Mumbai, India
来源
TRIPLE HELIX | 2024年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
collaboration; emerging markets; innovation systems; knowledge application; knowledge production; knowledge sharing; mixed methods; systems theory; social capital; triple helix; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION; TRIPLE-HELIX; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SPECIAL-ISSUE; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1163/21971927-bja10039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The increased complexity in the current business environment connected with the globalisation of economies and rapid technological developments makes firms depend on innovation and, in the process, develop dense networks of relationships, making collaboration an essential requisite for innovation. Thus, collaboration develops based on complex social networks from which innovation emerges. From this perspective, collaboration takes a systematic approach, where social relationships are crucial. This article describes the innovation behaviour of firms operating in India and introduces collaboration as a system drawing from the systems theory and triple helix innovation model. The results of the mixed methods study conducted pointed toward a fragile collaboration framework. Triangulation was employed to provide a deeper understanding. Furthermore, limited understanding of collaboration as a social system has constrained social interactions, leading to limited knowledge production, application, and knowledge sharing, with technological development and innovation delays. The article lists crucial factors from the perspectives of industry and academia to foster a collaboration framework.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 290
页数:66
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Aghion P, 2014, HBK ECON, P515, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00001-X
  • [2] India's Economic Reforms: Achievements and Next Steps
    Ahluwalia, Montek S.
    [J]. ASIAN ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEW, 2019, 14 (01) : 46 - 62
  • [3] Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study
    Ahuja, G
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) : 425 - 455
  • [4] Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues
    Alavi, M
    Leidner, DE
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) : 107 - 136
  • [5] The role of networking in the competitiveness of firms
    Alvarez, Isabel
    Marin, Raquel
    Fonfria, Antonio
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2009, 76 (03) : 410 - 421
  • [6] Alwis Ragna Seidler-de, 2008, Journal of Knowledge Management, V12, P133, DOI 10.1108/13673270810852449
  • [7] Learning and novelty of innovation in established manufacturing SMEs
    Amara, Nabil
    Landry, Rejean
    Becheikh, Nizar
    Ouimet, Mathieu
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (07) : 450 - 463
  • [8] Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review
    Ankrah, Samuel
    Al-Tabbaa, Omar
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 31 (03) : 387 - 408
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2014, Enterprise Surveys
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2022, What are Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)?