共 38 条
Thermophysiological responses and thermal comfort of occupants in indoor spaces under different speaking and non-speaking conditions
被引:2
|作者:
Zhang, Xuange
[1
]
Lee, Minhyun
[2
]
Cui, Xue
[1
]
Huang, Lijie
[1
]
Zhang, Ruixiaoxiao
[3
]
Uddin, Mohammad Nyme
[3
]
机构:
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Smart Energy RISE, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词:
Thermal comfort;
Thermophysiological parameters;
Speaking activities;
Experimental study;
Occupant response;
TEMPERATURE;
SENSATION;
SYSTEMS;
PMV;
D O I:
10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111682
中图分类号:
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号:
0813 ;
摘要:
As speaking is one of the fundamental behaviours in human activities, understanding the thermal comfort of occupants during speaking is crucial to providing a satisfactory environment. To further strengthen this understanding and identify how occupant thermal responses change during speaking activities, this study performs an experiment to examine the thermophysiological parameters and thermal comfort of occupants across three different speaking and non -speaking conditions: (1) silent (i.e., non -speaking); (2) speech (i.e., continuous speaking); and (3) conversation (i.e., intermittent speaking). During the experiment, thermophysiological parameters, including skin temperature, electrodermal activity, and heart rate, were collected using smart wristbands from 30 subjects at three different temperature settings to represent three distinct thermal environmental conditions: (1) Cold: 20 degrees C; (2) Neutral: 24 degrees C; and (3) Hot: 28 degrees C. Subjects were also required to report their thermal comfort perceptions in terms of thermal sensation votes, thermal preference votes, and thermal satisfaction votes. Repeated measures ANOVA test and Friedman test were used to analyse the thermophysiological parameters and thermal comfort perceptions. The null hypothesis, which suggests no significant differences in thermal responses and comfort across the three speaking conditions, will be rejected at a significance level of 0.05 (two -tail). The results revealed significant differences in all three thermophysiological parameters between speaking conditions at all temperature settings, while the thermal comfort perception did not consistently show statistically significant differences between speaking conditions. The findings contribute to our understanding of the relationship between communication and thermal responses, highlighting the importance of contextual factors in designing comfortable environments for speaking -related activities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文