External fixator as a safe method in the treatment of distal tibial fractures in children

Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of external fixator application in the treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures in children and to analyze differences between stable and unstable fractures. Methods Medical records of children with distal tibial MDJ fracture confirmed by imaging from January 2015 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into stable and unstable groups and parameters, including clinical and imaging data and Tornetta ankle score were compared. Results Twenty-five children, comprising 13 with stable and 12 with unstable fractures, were included in our study. The mean age was 7 years (range, 2-13.1 years), and there were 17 males and 8 females. All children had closed reduction, and the basic clinical data of the two groups were comparable. Stable fractures showed shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy, operation, and fracture healing times than unstable fractures. No significant difference in Tornetta ankle score was observed. Twenty-two patients had excellent ankle score, and three had a good ankle score, for a combined incidence of 100%. Two patients in the stable fracture group and one in the unstable fracture group developed a pin site infection, and one patient with unstable fracture showed a length discrepancy (discrepancy<1 cm). Conclusion External fixator is safe and effective for the treatment of distal tibial MDJ fractures, whether the fracture is stable or not. It has the advantages of minimally invasive, excellent ankle function score, few major complications, needless auxiliary cast fixation, and early functional exercise and weight bearing. Level of evidence Level IV.