共 39 条
Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance
被引:7
作者:
Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Nacl San Martin, Ciencia Polit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Ctr Prov, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词:
Bibliometrics (Thesaurus);
research evaluation;
peer review;
relevance (Author's keywords);
SCIENCE;
IMPACT;
POLICY;
STATE;
BIAS;
D O I:
10.7440/res58.2016.06
中图分类号:
D58 [社会生活与社会问题];
C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号:
摘要:
This article seeks to bring together in a single document the set of issues surrounding the definition and implementation of mechanisms and criteria relating to the evaluation of scientific research. It revisits and orders the basic agreements regarding their defects and the proposals for countering them based on a bibliographical review revolving around three questions: who participates in the assessment; how the assessment is carried out; and what is to be evaluated. Finally, it briefly presents some notes referring to the specific literature generated from Latin America, highlighting the limited space dedicated to this topic until now.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 86
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条