Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance

被引：7
|
作者：
Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nacl San Martin, Ciencia Polit, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Ctr Prov, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源：
REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES | 2016年 / 58期
关键词：
Bibliometrics (Thesaurus); research evaluation; peer review; relevance (Author's keywords); SCIENCE; IMPACT; POLICY; STATE; BIAS;
D O I：
10.7440/res58.2016.06
中图分类号：
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
摘要：
This article seeks to bring together in a single document the set of issues surrounding the definition and implementation of mechanisms and criteria relating to the evaluation of scientific research. It revisits and orders the basic agreements regarding their defects and the proposals for countering them based on a bibliographical review revolving around three questions: who participates in the assessment; how the assessment is carried out; and what is to be evaluated. Finally, it briefly presents some notes referring to the specific literature generated from Latin America, highlighting the limited space dedicated to this topic until now.
引用
收藏
页码：76 / 86
页数：11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Evaluation of research proposals by peer review panels: broader panels for broader assessments?
    Abma-Schouten, Rebecca
    Gijbels, Joey
    Reijmerink, Wendy
    Meijer, Ingeborg
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (04) : 619 - 632
  • [2] Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
    Giovanni Abramo
    Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    Scientometrics, 2011, 87 : 499 - 514
  • [3] Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 87 (03) : 499 - 514
  • [4] Limits of bibliometrics indicators in biomedical scientific research evaluation
    Camps, Diego
    COLOMBIA MEDICA, 2008, 39 (01): : 74 - 79
  • [5] Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators
    Al-Jamimi, Hamdi A.
    BinMakhashen, Galal M.
    Bornmann, Lutz
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (10) : 5879 - 5930
  • [6] Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators
    Hamdi A. Al-Jamimi
    Galal M. BinMakhashen
    Lutz Bornmann
    Scientometrics, 2022, 127 : 5879 - 5930
  • [7] Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review
    Derrick, Gemma E.
    Pavone, Vincenzo
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (05) : 563 - 575
  • [8] Alternatives to peer review: novel approaches for research evaluation
    Birukou, Aliaksandr
    Wakeling, Joseph Rushton
    Bartolini, Claudio
    Casati, Fabio
    Marchese, Maurizio
    Mirylenka, Katsiaryna
    Osman, Nardine
    Ragone, Azzurra
    Sierra, Carles
    Wassef, Aalam
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 5
  • [9] Bibliometrics Evaluation of Scientific Journals and Country Research Output of Dental Research in Latin America Using Scimago Journal and Country Rank
    Vaccaro, Gustavo
    Sanchez-Nunez, Pablo
    Witt-Rodriguez, Patricia
    PUBLICATIONS, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [10] National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings
    Giovanni Abramo
    Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    Flavia Di Costa
    Scientometrics, 2011, 89 : 929 - 941
1234