Effectiveness of intervention programs in reducing plagiarism by university students: a systematic review

被引:2
作者
Miranda-Rodriguez, Ruben Andres [1 ]
Sanchez-Nieto, Jose Miguel [1 ]
Ruiz-Rodriguez, Ana Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Estudios Super Zaragoza, Mexico City, Mexico
关键词
plagiarism; university students; academic dishonesty; academic integrity; cheating; INTEGRITY; ETHICS; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; TURNITIN; CODES;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1357853
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Plagiarism in universities is a problem with potential academic, social, ethical, and legal implications. Systematic review research on academic integrity programs, including plagiarism, has been conducted, but few studies have assessed plagiarism. Therefore, this review synthesizes knowledge on the effect of educational interventions designed to prevent or reduce plagiarism by university students. Method: A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria to analyze experimental or quasi-experimental studies aimed at reducing plagiarism through objective assessments. The search strategy was implemented in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, PsycArticles, ProQuest, ERIC, Redalyc, SciELO, and Tesiunam. Results: Six interventions were evaluated, and 1,631 undergraduate students were included pursuing different majors from different universities. The intervention and assessment strategies varied considerably between studies, 5 of which reported a lower plagiarism frequency in the intervention group than in the control group. Conclusion: The results suggest that interventions with practical elements, such as plagiarism detection, paraphrasing, citation skills, in addition to using software to identify similarities, may reduce plagiarism. However, few studies include an objective evaluation, so more research is needed. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-7-0104/.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02602930301677, 10.1080/02602930301677]
  • [2] Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct : A Systematic Review
    Awasthi, Shipra
    [J]. DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 39 (02): : 94 - 100
  • [3] A Strategy to Reduce Plagiarism in an Undergraduate Course
    Belter, Ronald W.
    du Pre, Athena
    [J]. TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 36 (04) : 257 - 261
  • [4] Belyy A, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, VOL 2, P157
  • [5] The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin®
    Bruton, Samuel
    Childers, Dan
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (02) : 316 - 330
  • [6] A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments
    Chiang, Feng-Kuang
    Zhu, Dan
    Yu, Wenhao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (04) : 907 - 928
  • [7] Online Academic-integrity Mastery Training May Improve Students' Awareness of, and Attitudes toward, Plagiarism
    Curtis, Guy J.
    Gouldthorp, Bethanie
    Thomas, Emma F.
    O'Brien, Geraldine M.
    Correia, Helen M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY LEARNING AND TEACHING-PLAT, 2013, 12 (03): : 282 - 289
  • [8] Dahl S., 2007, Active Learning in Higher Education, V8, P173, DOI DOI 10.1177/1469787407074110
  • [9] Rational Ignorance in Education A Field Experiment in Student Plagiarism
    Dee, Thomas S.
    Jacob, Brian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2012, 47 (02) : 397 - 434
  • [10] Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology
    Eaton, Sarah Elaine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2023, 19 (01)