Mind the border! Agents and functions to shape regional challenge-oriented innovation policy

被引:2
作者
Cappellano, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Uyarra, Elvira [2 ]
Flanagan, Kieron [2 ]
机构
[1] WSB Univ, Dept Management, Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, England
[3] Zygmunta Cieplaka 1c, PL-41300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland
关键词
border; cross-border region; innovation; mission; societalchallenge; SYSTEMS; COOPERATION; PROXIMITY; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2024.2359660
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper explores the operationalization of policy directionality in terms of goal consistency as well as the spatial dimensions of problems and solutions. The study focuses on cross-border regions (CBRs), since they are engaged in cooperation to tackle common challenges. This study employs a comparative analysis across two EU CBRs, drawing on a theoretical framework that integrates the trinity of agency scholarships and the literature on the multiplicity of border functions. By combining these perspectives, we aim to illustrate how agents navigate the opportunity spaces generated within CBRs. This paper aims to shed light on the interplay between agents to navigate the conditions that the presence of international border generates in the EU cross-border regions (CBR)s to tackle Societal Challenges (SC)s. Through this integrated framework, we explore how agents perceive, interpret, and respond to the complex dynamics and possibilities that emerge in CBRs, shedding light on the interplay between structure and agency in these unique spatial settings. The findings show how SC can be framed at different scales with ambivalent results in terms of consistency of policy goals. Framed through the trinity agency framework, actors interacted collectively to generate and transfer knowledge in the CBRs.
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1692
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Directionality in transformative policy missions: The case of reaching net zero emissions in the Swedish process industry [J].
Andersson, Johnn ;
Hellsmark, Hans .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 437
[2]   Directionality challenges for transformative innovation policy: lessons from implementing climate goals in the process industry [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Hellsmark, Hans ;
Karltorp, Kersti .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (08) :1110-1139
[3]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[4]   Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions [J].
Capello, Roberta ;
Caragliu, Andrea ;
Fratesi, Ugo .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2018, 52 (07) :986-996
[5]   Where innovation meets directionality: an index to measure regional readiness to deal with societal challenges [J].
Cappellano, Francesco ;
Makkonen, Teemu ;
Dotti, Nicola Francesco ;
Morisson, Arnault ;
Rizzo, Annalisa .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2022, 30 (08) :1549-1576
[6]   Cross border regional planning: insights from Cascadia [J].
Cappellano, Francesco ;
Richardson, Kathrine ;
Trautman, Laurie .
INTERNATIONAL PLANNING STUDIES, 2021, 26 (02) :182-197
[7]   Cross-border regional innovation ecosystems: the role of non-profit organizations in cross-border cooperation at the US-Mexico border [J].
Cappellano, Francesco ;
Makkonen, Teemu .
GEOJOURNAL, 2020, 85 (06) :1515-1528
[8]   The Proximity Puzzle in Cross-Border Regions [J].
Cappellano, Francesco ;
Makkonen, Teemu .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (03) :283-301
[9]   Economic drivers in cross-border regional innovation systems [J].
Cappellano, Francesco ;
Rizzo, Annalisa .
REGIONAL STUDIES REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 6 (01) :460-468
[10]   Theorising in urban and regional studies: negotiating generalisation and particularity [J].
Cox, Kevin R. ;
Evenhuis, Emil .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 13 (03) :425-442