In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration: An experimental study

被引:1
|
作者
Tuncludemir, Zeynep [1 ]
Cinar, Ihsan Caglar [2 ]
Kupeli, Zehra Avci [3 ]
Unlu, Elif [4 ]
Yalcin, Serdar [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Inst Grad Studies Hlth Sci, Oral Implantol Program, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Implantol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Pathol, Bursa, Turkiye
[4] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Surg, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Bone regeneration; Non-resorbable membranes; Customized CAD/CAM-manufactured mem-branes; Titanium; Zirconia; TITANIUM MESH; IMPLANT; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANES; VITRO;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32070
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effects of customized zirconia barrier membranes produced for guided bone regeneration (GBR) approaches on bone healing researched with histological and histomorphometric methods. Methods: The digital modeling was used to create zirconia barrier membranes suitable for the defect on the tibia bone. The membranes were designed using a 3D software system and transferred to the CAD/CAM software system in stl. Afterward, zirconia discs (1400 Mpa) (Aconia BSM- D98 x 16, HT+, Germany) were milled and sintered. Titanium mesh, titanium reinforced dPTFE, and zirconia barrier membranes were used to cover the defects. As a control group, one defect was left empty. 3 and 6 weeks of the healing term, preparates were obtained from each group after animals were sacrificed. New bone formation, amount of the remaining grafts and tissue response parameters were analyzed histomorphometrically and histologically. Results: The highest percentage of newly formed bone in the early period was observed in the titanium mesh membrane group (26.39 +/- 5.38); In the late period, this rate was highest in the zirconia group (64.42 +/- 9.95). However, no statistically significant difference was found in both periods between the groups. The amount of residual graft progressed at a low level in both periods without any difference in the other groups except the control group. In the 3rd and 6th weeks, the amount of new bone formation was the lowest in the control group. No foreign body reaction or necrosis was observed in any of the defects. Conclusion: With the limitation of the study, it has been concluded that effective results can be obtained with customized zirconia barrier membranes in GBR procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Static and dynamic guided bone regeneration using a shape-memory polyethylene terephthalate membrane: An experimental study in rabbit mandible
    Imoto, Kazuhiro
    Hoshi, Karen
    Odashima, Kenji
    Nogami, Shinnosuke
    Unuma, Hidero
    Yamauchi, Kensuke
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (04) : 734 - 741
  • [42] Surface Modification of Pure Magnesium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration: In Vivo Evaluation of Rat Calvarial Defect
    Wu, Shuang
    Jang, Yong-Seok
    Kim, Yu-Kyoung
    Kim, Seo-Young
    Ko, Seung-O
    Lee, Min-Ho
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (17)
  • [43] Biological performance of a novel bovine hydroxyapatite in a guided bone regeneration model: A preclinical study in a mandibular defect in dogs
    De Carvalho, Bruno
    Dory, Emilie
    Trus, Caroline
    Pirson, Justine
    Germain, Loic
    Lecloux, Geoffrey
    Lambert, France
    Rompen, Eric
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (01) : 183 - 196
  • [44] Guided bone regeneration of non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Sanz, Mariano
    Ferrantino, Luca
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    de Sanctis, Massimo
    Berglundh, Tord
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1466 - 1476
  • [45] Homeopathic treatment for bone regeneration: experimental study
    Almeida, Janete Dias
    Loschiavo Arisawa, Emilia Angela
    Balducci, Ivan
    da Rocha, Rosilene Fernandes
    Carvalho, Yasmin Rodarte
    HOMEOPATHY, 2009, 98 (02) : 92 - 96
  • [46] Effects of bone drilling on local temperature and bone regeneration: an in vivo study
    Karaca, Faruk
    Aksakal, Bunyamin
    Kom, Mustafa
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2014, 48 (03) : 326 - 332
  • [47] Clinical comparison of resorbable and non-resorbable barriers for guided periodontal tissue regeneration
    Caffesse, RG
    Mota, LF
    Quinones, CR
    Morrison, EC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 24 (10) : 747 - 752
  • [48] Hard and soft tissue changes after guided bone regeneration using two different barrier membranes: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Di Raimondo, Riccardo
    Sanz-Esporrin, Javier
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Pla, Rafael
    Luengo, Fernando
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    Nunez, Javier
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (04) : 2213 - 2227
  • [49] Platelet-rich fibrin combined with a particulate bone substitute versus guided bone regeneration in the damaged extraction socket: An in vivo study
    Park, Jin-Young
    Hong, Kyu-Jin
    Ko, Kyung-A
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Gruber, Reinhard
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 50 (03) : 358 - 367
  • [50] In vivo bone regeneration by differently designed titanium membrane with or without surface treatment: a study in rat calvarial defects
    Jang, Yong-Seok
    Moon, So-Hee
    Thuy-Duong Thi Nguyen
    Lee, Min-Ho
    Oh, Tae-Ju
    Han, A-Lum
    Bae, Tae-Sung
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2019, 10