In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration: An experimental study

被引:1
|
作者
Tuncludemir, Zeynep [1 ]
Cinar, Ihsan Caglar [2 ]
Kupeli, Zehra Avci [3 ]
Unlu, Elif [4 ]
Yalcin, Serdar [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Inst Grad Studies Hlth Sci, Oral Implantol Program, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Implantol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Pathol, Bursa, Turkiye
[4] Bursa Uludag Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Surg, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Bone regeneration; Non-resorbable membranes; Customized CAD/CAM-manufactured mem-branes; Titanium; Zirconia; TITANIUM MESH; IMPLANT; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANES; VITRO;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32070
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effects of customized zirconia barrier membranes produced for guided bone regeneration (GBR) approaches on bone healing researched with histological and histomorphometric methods. Methods: The digital modeling was used to create zirconia barrier membranes suitable for the defect on the tibia bone. The membranes were designed using a 3D software system and transferred to the CAD/CAM software system in stl. Afterward, zirconia discs (1400 Mpa) (Aconia BSM- D98 x 16, HT+, Germany) were milled and sintered. Titanium mesh, titanium reinforced dPTFE, and zirconia barrier membranes were used to cover the defects. As a control group, one defect was left empty. 3 and 6 weeks of the healing term, preparates were obtained from each group after animals were sacrificed. New bone formation, amount of the remaining grafts and tissue response parameters were analyzed histomorphometrically and histologically. Results: The highest percentage of newly formed bone in the early period was observed in the titanium mesh membrane group (26.39 +/- 5.38); In the late period, this rate was highest in the zirconia group (64.42 +/- 9.95). However, no statistically significant difference was found in both periods between the groups. The amount of residual graft progressed at a low level in both periods without any difference in the other groups except the control group. In the 3rd and 6th weeks, the amount of new bone formation was the lowest in the control group. No foreign body reaction or necrosis was observed in any of the defects. Conclusion: With the limitation of the study, it has been concluded that effective results can be obtained with customized zirconia barrier membranes in GBR procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration
    Artas, Gokhan
    Gul, Mehmet
    Acikan, Izzet
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Bozoglan, Alihan
    Simsek, Sercan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Dundar, Serkan
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [22] Modulation of gene expression and bone formation by expanded and dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes during guided bone regeneration: An experimental study
    Turri, Alberto
    Omar, Omar
    Trobos, Margarita
    Thomsen, Peter
    Dahlin, Christer
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (02) : 266 - 280
  • [23] Guided bone regeneration with local zoledronic acid and titanium barrier: An experimental study
    Dundar, Serkan
    Ozgur, Cem
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Cakmak, Omer
    Saybak, Arif
    Ozercan, Ibrahim Hanifi
    Alan, Hilal
    Artas, Gokhan
    Nacakgedigi, Onur
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (04) : 2015 - 2020
  • [24] Full-Digital Customized Meshes in Guided Bone Regeneration Procedures: A Scoping Review
    Scribante, Andrea
    Ghizzoni, Martina
    Pellegrini, Matteo
    Pulicari, Federica
    Manfredini, Mattia
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Maiorana, Carlo
    Spadari, Francesco
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (02): : 480 - 495
  • [25] Customized CAD/CAM titanium meshes for the guided bone regeneration of severe alveolar ridge defects: Preliminary results of a retrospective clinical study in humans
    Chiapasco, Matteo
    Casentini, Paolo
    Tommasato, Grazia
    Dellavia, Claudia
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (04) : 498 - 510
  • [26] In vivo gene expression profile of guided bone regeneration associated with a microrough titanium surface
    Donos, N.
    Retzepi, M.
    Wall, I.
    Hamlet, S.
    Ivanovski, S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (04) : 390 - 398
  • [27] Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbit
    Di Carlo, F
    Prosper, L
    Ripari, F
    Scarano, A
    BIOCERAMICS, 2000, 192-1 : 403 - 407
  • [28] The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets.: An experimental study in dogs
    Kohal, RJ
    Mellas, P
    Hürzeler, MB
    Trejo, PM
    Morrison, E
    Caffesse, RG
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (08) : 927 - 937
  • [29] In vivo experimental study comparing alveolar ridge preservation versus guided bone regeneration after unassisted socket healing at intact and damaged sites in narrow alveolar ridges
    Shin, Hae Jee
    Park, Jin-Young
    Tien, Hsu Kuo
    Strauss, Franz-Josef
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2025, 96 (03) : 279 - 289
  • [30] Clinical and radiographic intrasubject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results
    Benic, Goran I.
    Bernasconi, Mira
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (03) : 315 - 325