Unveiling predictors influencing patent licensing: Analyzing patent scope in robotics and automation

被引:3
作者
Alkhazaleh, Razan [1 ]
Mykoniatis, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Ind & Syst Engn Dept, Auburn, AL 36830 USA
关键词
Patent licensing; Technology transfer; Patent scope; Predictors; Claims; Patent metrics; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.wpi.2024.102276
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Ensuring the sustainability of technology transfer offices depends on effective patent licensing strategies. This study investigates novel predictors for patent licensing prediction. It emphasizes the importance of judiciously selecting suitable patent-scope metrics to enhance the likelihood of successful patent licensing agreements. This work focuses on a critical aspect of patent scope, specifically examining the number of independent claims, the length of the first claim, the depth of the claim, the Cooperative Patent classification count, the non-US family count, and the family independent count. Additionally, we consider conventional metrics previously investigated in prior research, such as claim count, the count within the International Patent Classification, and Simple Family Application. Our empirical analysis harnesses a dataset comprising patents from university technology transfers within the robotics and automation domain. We analyze the relationship between patent scope measures and licensing outcomes using data visualization and statistical techniques, including the point-biserial correlation coefficient and the t-test. Comparative analysis of the statistical results is performed to identify the most impactful predictor. Our study reveals a correlation between the number of independent claims and the success of patent licensing. In contrast, the rest of the investigated measures do not impact the success of patent licensing.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Adams S., 2000, World Patent Information, V22, P291, DOI 10.1016/S0172-2190(00)00073-9
[2]   ?Nothing new under the sun?; do we need new searching protocols to establish the patentability of industry 4.0 inventions? [J].
Adams, Stephen R. .
WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2023, 72
[3]   University-Industry partnerships in the smart specialisation era [J].
Aksoy, Arman Y. ;
Pulizzotto, Davide ;
Beaudry, Catherine .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 176
[4]  
Alkhazaleh R., 2022, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, V8, DOI DOI 10.3390/JOITMC8040202
[5]  
AUTM, STATT: Statistics Access for Technology Transfer Database
[6]   What's Your Stake When Engaging in Licensing? A Comparison Between Standard and Partnership-Embedded Licensing Strategies [J].
Belingheri, Paola ;
Leone, Maria Isabella ;
Lombardi, Sara .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (06) :2058-2070
[7]   Buyers in the patent auction market: Opening the black box of patent acquisitions by non-practicing entities [J].
Caviggioli, Federico ;
Ughetto, Elisa .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 104 :122-132
[8]   A Predictive Model of Technology Transfer Using Patent Analysis [J].
Choi, Jaehyun ;
Jang, Dongsik ;
Jun, Sunghae ;
Park, Sangsung .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (12) :16175-16195
[9]   A study on the time-dependent changes of the intensities of factors determining patent lifespan from a biological perspective [J].
Choi, Yong Muk ;
Cho, Daemyeong .
WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2018, 54 :1-17
[10]   Motivational factors for patenting: A study of the Brazilian researchers profile [J].
de Jesus, Carlos Silva ;
Cardoso, Douglas de Oliveira ;
de Souza, Cristina Gomes .
WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2023, 75