Quantitative, real-time scintillation imaging for experimental comparison of different dose and dose rate estimations in UHDR proton pencil beams

被引:2
作者
Clark, Megan [1 ]
Harms, Joseph [2 ]
Vasyltsiv, Roman [1 ]
Sloop, Austin [1 ]
Kozelka, Jakub [3 ]
Simon, Bill [3 ]
Zhang, Rongxiao [1 ]
Gladstone, David [1 ]
Bruza, Petr [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiat Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Sun Nucl Inc, Melbourne, FL USA
关键词
imaging; PBS; UHDR; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.17247
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundUltra-high dose rate radiotherapy (UHDR-RT) has demonstrated normal tissue sparing capabilities, termed the FLASH effect; however, available dosimetry tools make it challenging to characterize the UHDR beams with sufficiently high concurrent spatial and temporal resolution. Novel dosimeters are needed for safe clinical implementation and improved understanding of the effect of UHDR-RT.PurposeUltra-fast scintillation imaging has been shown to provide a unique tool for spatio-temporal dosimetry of conventional cyclotron pencil beam scanning (PBS) deliveries, indicating the potential use for characterization of UHDR PBS proton beams. The goal of this work is to introduce this novel concept and demonstrate its capabilities in recording high-resolution dose rate maps at FLASH-capable proton beam currents, as compared to log-based dose rate calculation, internally developed UHDR beam simulation, and a fast point detector (EDGE diode).MethodsThe light response of a scintillator sheet located at isocenter and irradiated by PBS proton fields (40-210 nA, 250 MeV) was imaged by an ultra-fast iCMOS camera at 4.5-12 kHz sampling frequency. Camera sensor and image intensifier gain were optimized to maximize the dynamic range; the camera acquisition rate was also varied to evaluate the optimal sampling frequency. Large field delivery enabled flat field acquisition for evaluation of system response homogeneity. Image intensity was calibrated to dose with film and the recorded spatio-temporal data was compared to a PPC05 ion chamber, log-based reconstruction, and EDGE diode. Dose and dose rate linearity studies were performed to evaluate agreement under various beam conditions. Calculation of full-field mean and PBS dose rate maps were calculated to highlight the importance of high resolution, full-field information in UHDR studies.ResultsCamera response was linear with dose (R2 = 0.997) and current (R22 = 0.98) in the range from 2-22 Gy and 40-210 nA, respectively, when compared to ion chamber readings. The deviation of total irradiation time calculated with the imaging system from the log file recordings decreased from 0.07% to 0.03% when imaging at 12 kfps versus 4.5 kfps. Planned and delivered spot positions agreed within 0.2 +/-$\pm$ 0.1 mm and total irradiation time agreed within 0.2 +/-$\pm$ 0.2 ms when compared with the log files, indicating the high concurrent spatial and temporal resolution. For all deliveries, the PBS dose rate measured at the diode location agreed between the imaging and the diode within 3% +/-$\pm$ 2% and with the simulation within 5% +/-$\pm$ 3%ConclusionsFull-field mapping of dose and dose rate is imperative for complete understanding of UHDR PBS proton dose delivery. The high linearity and various spatiotemporal metric reporting capabilities confirm the continued use of this camera system for UHDR beam characterization, especially for spatially resolved dose rate information.
引用
收藏
页码:6402 / 6411
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Dosimetry for FLASH Radiotherapy: A Review of Tools and the Role of Radioluminescence and Cherenkov Emission
    Ashraf, Muhammad Ramish
    Rahman, Mahbubur
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Williams, Benjamin B.
    Gladstone, David J.
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Bruza, Petr
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2020, 8
  • [2] Review of plastic and liquid scintillation dosimetry for photon, electron, and proton therapy
    Beaulieu, Luc
    Beddar, Sam
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (20) : R305 - R343
  • [3] Ultra-fast, high spatial resolution single-pulse scintillation imaging of synchrocyclotron pencil beam scanning proton delivery
    Clark, Megan
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Zhao, Lewei
    Pogue, Brian
    Gladstone, David
    Rahman, Mahbubur
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Bruza, Petr
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04)
  • [4] FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
    Cunningham, Shannon
    McCauley, Shelby
    Vairamani, Kanimozhi
    Speth, Joseph
    Girdhani, Swati
    Abel, Eric
    Sharma, Ricky A.
    Perentesis, John P.
    Wells, Susanne I.
    Mascia, Anthony
    Sertorio, Mathieu
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 15
  • [5] The current status of preclinical proton FLASH radiation and future directions
    Diffenderfer, Eric S.
    Sorensen, Brita S.
    Mazal, Alejandro
    Carlson, David J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (03) : 2039 - 2054
  • [6] Image guidance for FLASH radiotherapy
    El Naqa, Issam
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Oraiqat, Ibrahim
    Parodi, Katia
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : 4109 - 4122
  • [7] Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice
    Favaudon, Vincent
    Caplier, Laura
    Monceau, Virginie
    Pouzoulet, Frederic
    Sayarath, Mano
    Fouillade, Charles
    Poupon, Marie-France
    Brito, Isabel
    Hupe, Philippe
    Bourhis, Jean
    Hall, Janet
    Fontaine, Jean-Jacques
    Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
    [J]. SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 6 (245)
  • [8] A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning
    Folkerts, Michael M.
    Abel, Eric
    Busold, Simon
    Perez, Jessica Rika
    Krishnamurthi, Vidhya
    Ling, C. Clifton
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (12) : 6396 - 6404
  • [9] Time structure of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH beams measured with scintillator detectors and compared with log files
    Kanouta, Eleni
    Johansen, Jacob Graversen
    Kertzscher, Gustavo
    Sitarz, Mateusz Krzysztof
    Sorensen, Brita Singers
    Poulsen, Per Rugaard
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (03) : 1932 - 1943
  • [10] Correction for Ion Recombination in a Built-in Monitor Chamber o a Clinical Linear Accelerator at Ultra-High Dose Rates
    Konradsson, Elise
    Ceberg, Crister
    Lempart, Michael
    Blad, Borje
    Back, Sven
    Knoos, Tommy
    Petersson, Kristoffer
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 194 (06) : 580 - 586