Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders

被引:1
作者
Villotti, Patrizia [1 ,2 ]
Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin [3 ]
Roy, Jean-Sebastien [4 ,5 ]
Corbiere, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Negrini, Alessia [6 ]
Lariviere, Christian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Educ & Pedag Career Counseling, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Inst Univ Sante Mentale Montreal, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf UKE, Inst Occupat & Maritime Med ZfAM, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Sch Rehabil Sci, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Rehabil Inst, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integra, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Inst Rech Robert Sauve Sante & Secur Travail, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 07期
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; BEST-EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS; RECOVERY EXPECTATIONS; TO-WORK; RISK-FACTORS; WORKPLACE ABSENCE; FEAR-AVOIDANCE; FOLLOW-UP; MODIFIABLE WORKER; PREDICTIVE MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0307284
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematically examined and synthetized the research evidence available in the literature on the topic, and 2) critically evaluated the tools used to measure each identified factor. A systematic search of prognostic studies was conducted, considering four groups of keywords: 1) population (i.e., MSDs or CMDs), 2) study design (prospective), 3) modifiable factors, 4) outcomes of interest (i.e., RTW). Studies showing high risk of bias were eliminated. Tools used to measure prognostic factors were assessed using psychometric and usability criteria. From the 78 studies that met inclusion criteria, 19 (for MSDs) and 5 (for CMDs) factors reaching moderate or strong evidence were extracted. These factors included work accommodations, RTW expectations, job demands (physical), job demands (psychological), job strain, work ability, RTW self-efficacy, expectations of recovery, locus of control, referred pain (back pain), activities as assessed with disability questionnaires, pain catastrophizing, coping strategies, fears, illness behaviours, mental vitality, a positive health change, sleep quality, and participation. Measurement tools ranged from single-item tools to multi-item standardized questionnaires or subscales. The former generally showed low psychometric properties but excellent usability, whereas the later showed good to excellent psychometric properties and variable usability. The rigorous approach to the selection of eligible studies allowed the identification of a relatively small set of prognostic factors, but with a higher level of certainty. For each factor, the present tool assessment allows an informed choice to balance psychometric and usability criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [1] Prognostic factors in short-term disability due to musculoskeletal disorders
    Abasolo, Lydia
    Carmona, Loreto
    Lajas, Cristina
    Candelas, Gloria
    Blanco, Margarita
    Loza, Estibaliz
    Hernandez-Garcia, Cesar
    Jover, Juan A.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (04): : 489 - 496
  • [2] The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health - a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave
    Ahlstrom, Linda
    Grimby-Ekman, Anna
    Hagberg, Mats
    Dellve, Lotta
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2010, 36 (05) : 404 - 412
  • [3] How Do Organizational Policies and Practices Affect Return to Work and Work Role Functioning Following a Musculoskeletal Injury?
    Amick, Benjamin C., III
    Lee, Hyunmi
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    Brouwer, Sandra
    Franche, Renee-Louise
    Bultmann, Ute
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 27 (03) : 393 - 404
  • [4] ` An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Devin, Clinton J.
    Archer, Kristin R.
    Chotai, Silky
    Parker, Scott L.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Nian, Hui
    Harrell, Frank E., Jr.
    Speroff, Theodore
    Dittus, Robert S.
    Philips, Sharon E.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Foley, Kevin T.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (04) : 370 - 381
  • [5] Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Interventions and Psychoeducation Implemented by Rehabilitation Specialists to Treat Fear-Avoidance Beliefs in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Baez, Shelby
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    Hoch, Johanna M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (11): : 2287 - 2298
  • [6] Bandura A., 2006, SELF EFFICACY BELIEF, P307, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • [7] Vocational Rehabilitation with or without Work Module for Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Sick Leave from Work: Longitudinal Impact on Work Participation
    Beemster, Timo T.
    van Bennekom, Coen A. M.
    van Velzen, Judith M.
    Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
    Reneman, Michiel F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 31 (01) : 72 - 83
  • [8] Bellotti L., 2023, De Gruyter Handbook of Disability and Management, P105
  • [9] Bontoux L., 2004, Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique, V47, P563, DOI 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.03.006
  • [10] Assessment of social functioning in depression
    Bosc, M
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 41 (01) : 63 - 69