A Comprehensive Evaluation of 16 Old and New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Pediatric Eyes

被引:1
作者
Achiron, Asaf [1 ,2 ]
Yahalomi, Tal [3 ,4 ]
Biran, Amit [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Eliya [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Eyal [1 ,2 ]
Elbaz, Uri [2 ,5 ]
Ali, Asim [6 ,7 ]
Mireskandari, Kamiar [6 ,7 ]
Tuuminen, Raimo [8 ,9 ]
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy V. [10 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Helsinki Retina Res Grp, Helsinki, Finland
[9] Kymenlaakso Cent Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kotka, Finland
[10] Kyiv Clin Ophthalmol Hosp, Eye Microsurg Ctr, Komarov Ave 3, UA-03680 Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
IOL power; formulas; pediatric eyes; calculation; axial length; AXIAL LENGTH; ACCURACY; CATARACT;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S470425
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of 16 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract eyes. Patients and Methods: The data records of pediatric patients who had been implanted with three IOL models (SA60AT, MA60AC, and enVista-MX60) between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. The accuracy of 16 IOL power calculation methods was evaluated: Barrett SRK/T, T2, VRF, and VRF-G. The non-optimized (ULIB/IOLcon) and optimized constants were used for IOL power calculation. The mean prediction error (PE), Performance Index (FPI), and all descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Ninety-seven eyes of 97 pediatric patients aged 13.2 (IQR 11.2-17.1) were included. No statistically significant difference (HS-test) was observed (p > 0.818) except for the Hoffer Q, and Naeser 2 (P = 0.014). With optimized lens constants, the best FPI indices were obtained by Hoffer Q (0.256) and VRF-G (0.251) formulas, followed by Hill-RBF 3.0 and BUII, with an index of 0.248. The highest FPI indices with non-optimized constants showed SRK/T and T2 formulas (0.246 and 0.245, respectively), followed by VRF-G and Holladay 1, with an index of 0.244. The best median absolute error values (MedAE) were achieved by Hoffer Q (0.50 D), VRF-G (0.53 D), and Hill-RBF 3.0 (0.54 D), all P >= 0.074. Conclusion: Our results place the Hoffer Q, VRF-G, Hill-RBF 3.0, and BUII formulas as more accurate predictors of postoperative refraction in pediatric cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations in paediatric eyes [J].
Li, Jianbing ;
Liu, Zhenzhen ;
Wang, Ruixin ;
Cheng, Huanhuan ;
Zhao, Jing ;
Liu, Liangping ;
Chen, Weirong ;
Wu, Mingxing ;
Liu, Yizhi .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 48 (03) :301-310
[22]   Accuracy of newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract patients [J].
Lin, Lei ;
Fang, Jiayan ;
Sun, Weijie ;
Gu, Siyi ;
Xu, Liming ;
Chen, Siping ;
Chang, Pingjun ;
Zhao, Yun-e .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (04) :1019-1027
[23]   Accuracy of thick-lens intraocular lens power calculation based on cutting-card or calculated data for lens architecture [J].
Naeser, Kristian ;
Savini, Giacomo .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (10) :1422-1429
[24]   Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery [J].
Nihalani, B. R. ;
VanderVeen, D. K. .
EYE, 2017, 31 (03) :417-421
[25]  
Rahi JS, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P1444
[26]   Predictive Accuracy of the Hill-RBF 2.0 Formula in Pediatric Eyes: Comparison of 5 Intraocular Lens Formulas [J].
Rastogi, Anju ;
Singiri, Deepthi ;
Kumar, Prateek ;
Thakar, Meenakshi ;
Baindur, Siddharth ;
Bhardwaj, Ankita .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2023, 60 (04) :282-287
[27]   Evaluation of IOL power calculation with the Kane formula for pediatric cataract surgery [J].
Reitblat, Olga ;
Khalili, Sina ;
Ali, Asim ;
Mireskandari, Kamiar ;
Vega, Yakov ;
Tuuminen, Raimo ;
Elbaz, Uri ;
Sella, Ruti .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 260 (09) :2877-2885
[28]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE SRK/T INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANT POWER CALCULATION FORMULA [J].
RETZLAFF, JA ;
SANDERS, DR ;
KRAFF, MC .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (03) :333-340
[29]   Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging [J].
Savini, Giacomo ;
Taroni, Leonardo ;
Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico ;
Hoffer, Kenneth J. .
EYE, 2021, 35 (01) :307-315
[30]   Improving, the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula [J].
Sheard, Richard M. ;
Smith, Guy T. ;
Cooke, David L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (11) :1829-1834