A Comprehensive Evaluation of 16 Old and New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Pediatric Eyes

被引:1
作者
Achiron, Asaf [1 ,2 ]
Yahalomi, Tal [3 ,4 ]
Biran, Amit [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Eliya [1 ,2 ]
Cohen, Eyal [1 ,2 ]
Elbaz, Uri [2 ,5 ]
Ali, Asim [6 ,7 ]
Mireskandari, Kamiar [6 ,7 ]
Tuuminen, Raimo [8 ,9 ]
Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy V. [10 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Samson Assuta Ashdod Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Hlth Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
[5] Tel Aviv Univ, Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Ophthalmol & Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Helsinki Retina Res Grp, Helsinki, Finland
[9] Kymenlaakso Cent Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kotka, Finland
[10] Kyiv Clin Ophthalmol Hosp, Eye Microsurg Ctr, Komarov Ave 3, UA-03680 Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
IOL power; formulas; pediatric eyes; calculation; axial length; AXIAL LENGTH; ACCURACY; CATARACT;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S470425
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the accuracy of 16 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in pediatric cataract eyes. Patients and Methods: The data records of pediatric patients who had been implanted with three IOL models (SA60AT, MA60AC, and enVista-MX60) between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. The accuracy of 16 IOL power calculation methods was evaluated: Barrett SRK/T, T2, VRF, and VRF-G. The non-optimized (ULIB/IOLcon) and optimized constants were used for IOL power calculation. The mean prediction error (PE), Performance Index (FPI), and all descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Ninety-seven eyes of 97 pediatric patients aged 13.2 (IQR 11.2-17.1) were included. No statistically significant difference (HS-test) was observed (p > 0.818) except for the Hoffer Q, and Naeser 2 (P = 0.014). With optimized lens constants, the best FPI indices were obtained by Hoffer Q (0.256) and VRF-G (0.251) formulas, followed by Hill-RBF 3.0 and BUII, with an index of 0.248. The highest FPI indices with non-optimized constants showed SRK/T and T2 formulas (0.246 and 0.245, respectively), followed by VRF-G and Holladay 1, with an index of 0.244. The best median absolute error values (MedAE) were achieved by Hoffer Q (0.50 D), VRF-G (0.53 D), and Hill-RBF 3.0 (0.54 D), all P >= 0.074. Conclusion: Our results place the Hoffer Q, VRF-G, Hill-RBF 3.0, and BUII formulas as more accurate predictors of postoperative refraction in pediatric cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: Comparison of formulas and methods [J].
Abulafia, Adi ;
Barrett, Graham D. ;
Rotenberg, Michael ;
Kleinmann, Guy ;
Levy, Adi ;
Reitblat, Olga ;
Koch, Douglas D. ;
Wang, Li ;
Assia, Ehud I. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (03) :548-556
[2]   Accuracy of new and standard intraocular lens power calculations formulae in Saudi pediatric patients [J].
An-Nakhli, Fouad Raja .
TAIWAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 9 (01) :37-42
[4]   Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (08) :1157-1164
[5]   Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service [J].
Darcy, Kieren ;
Gunn, David ;
Tavassoli, Shokufeh ;
Sparrow, John ;
Kane, Jack X. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (01) :2-7
[6]   The PEARL-DGS Formula: The Development of an Open-source Machine Learning-based Thick IOL Calculation Formula [J].
Debellemaniere, Guillaume ;
Dubois, Mathieu ;
Gauvin, Mathieu ;
Wallerstein, Avi ;
Brenner, Luis F. ;
Rampat, Radhika ;
Saad, Alain ;
Gatinel, Damien .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 232 :58-69
[7]   Effect of axial length and keratometry measurement error on intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients [J].
Eibschitz-Tsimhoni, Maya ;
Tsimhoni, Omer ;
Archer, Steven M. ;
Del Monte, Monte A. .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2008, 12 (02) :173-176
[8]   Comparison of the Barrett Universal II formula to previous generation formulae for paediatric cataract surgery [J].
Elbaz, Uri ;
Khalili, Sina ;
Sella, Ruti ;
Reitblat, Olga ;
Vega, Yakov ;
Achiron, Asaf ;
Tuuminen, Raimo ;
Ali, Asim ;
Mireskandari, Kamiar .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2022, 100 (06) :682-689
[9]   Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis [J].
Haigis, W ;
Lege, B ;
Miller, N ;
Schneider, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) :765-773
[10]  
Hill WE, Hill-RBF Calculator v. 3.0