Optimal energy storage system selection for future cost-effective green hydrogen production: Integrating techno-economic, risk-based decision making, and cost projections

被引:3
作者
Syauqi, Ahmad [1 ]
Lee, Hyunjun [1 ]
Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan [1 ]
Lim, Hankwon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Chem Engn, Ulju gun, 50 UNIST Gil, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
[2] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Carbon Neutral, 50 UNIST Gil, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
[3] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, Carbon Neutral Demonstrat & Res Ctr, 50 UNIST Gil, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
关键词
Energy storage; Techno-economic analysis; Risk analysis; Green hydrogen; Cost projections; ALKALINE WATER ELECTROLYSIS; BATTERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142468
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study conducts technical, economic, and safety analysis of a green hydrogen production system consisting of a 1000 kWp photovoltaic cell, 3 options of energy storage namely lead carbon (PbC), lithium -ion (Li -ion), and repurposed lithium -ion (2nd Life Li -ion) battery, and an electrolyzer. Firstly, the system is optimized to maximum hydrogen production by adjusting equipment capacity and capacity factors, informed by a 1-h resolution solar energy generation profile. This optimization yields insights into the system's yearly operational dynamics. Techno-economic analysis was conducted to estimate the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) from 2020 to 2050, additionally, uncertainty analysis using Monte -Carlo simulation to estimate the range of uncertainty in LCOH projection from 2020 to 2050 was performed. Furthermore, a quantitative risk analysis, utilizing the process route index metric, evaluates the risk of battery explosions. Finally, this study employs multi -criteria decision-making to choose the best energy storage technology to produce green hydrogen from economic and safety factors. The result indicates that in 2020, the PbC battery emerged as the most cost-effective option. However, over time, both lithium batteries became the cheapest option with almost similar trends. In terms of explosion hazard, the analysis shows that the PbC battery is a safer option for stationary energy storage. When both aspects are considered, the preferred battery option is almost certainly PbC over the years, but in extreme cases where the decision-maker places significant emphasis on economic factors both Li -ion options may become preferable.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Abdi H, 2017, DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SYSTEMS: DESIGN, OPERATION AND GRID INTEGRATION, P333, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804208-3.00007-8
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Geopolitics of the Energy Transformation -The Hydrogen Factor
  • [3] Techno-enviro-economic analysis of integrated direct chemical looping coal-based power generation and methanol synthesis using renewable hydrogen
    Asih, Surya Ayuati Ning
    Syauqi, Ahmad
    Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION, 2021, 54 (54)
  • [4] Experimental study on fire hazard of LiCoO2-based lithium-ion batteries with gel electrolyte using a cone calorimeter
    Cao, Junda
    Ju, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Yang
    Zhou, Xiaodong
    Hu, Yue
    Li, Lun
    Wang, Dong
    Cao, Bei
    Yang, Lizhong
    Peng, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 32
  • [5] Increasing the lifetime profitability of battery energy storage systems through aging aware operation
    Collath, Nils
    Cornejo, Martin
    Engwerth, Veronika
    Hesse, Holger
    Jossen, Andreas
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 348
  • [6] Coromandel, 2020, Lifespan WWW Document
  • [7] Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance
    De Soto, W
    Klein, SA
    Beckman, WA
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2006, 80 (01) : 78 - 88
  • [8] Perspective and advanced development of lead-carbon battery for inhibition of hydrogen evolution
    Dhanabalan, K.
    Raziq, Fazal
    Wang, Yong
    Zhao, Yang
    Mavlonov, Abdurashid
    Ali, Sharafat
    Qiao, Liang
    [J]. EMERGENT MATERIALS, 2020, 3 (06) : 791 - 805
  • [9] Experimental investigation of environmental pressure effects on thermal runaway properties of 21700 lithium-ion batteries with high energy density
    Ding, Chao
    Zhu, Nannan
    Yu, Jialing
    Li, Yuyao
    Sun, Xiepeng
    Liu, Changcheng
    Huang, Que
    Wang, Jian
    [J]. CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 38
  • [10] Organic Batteries Operated at -70°C
    Dong, Xiaoli
    Guo, Zhaowei
    Guo, Ziyang
    Wang, Yonggang
    Xia, Yongyao
    [J]. JOULE, 2018, 2 (05) : 902 - 913