Corn grain and silage yield class prediction for zone delineation using high-resolution satellite imagery

被引:1
|
作者
Sunoj, S. [1 ]
Polson, Benjamin [1 ]
Vaish, Isha [1 ]
Marcaida III, Manuel [1 ]
Longchamps, Louis [2 ]
van Aardt, Jan [3 ]
Ketterings, Quirine M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Nutrient Management Spear Program, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Chester F Carlson Ctr Imaging Sci, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Corn; Remote sensing; Satellite; Soil indices; Vegetation indices; Yield monitor; REFLECTANCE; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104009
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Reliable stability zone delineation requires considering spatial variability from each year and temporal variability across at least three years. Yet, in cases where farms lack either temporal or spatial records, leveraging remote sensing and machine learning to predict corn (Zea mays L.) yield classes should be studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of corn yield class prediction models and their practical applications: (i) adding yield maps for years with missing yield monitor data from the same field; and (ii) expanding yield mapping to corn fields without yield monitor data on the same farm. The predicted yield class maps were used to delineate stability zone maps and compared against the zones delineated from yield monitor data. METHODS: Our dataset consisted of yield monitor data for three consecutive years of corn grain and silage fields, across three farms in New York, USA. For each farm, yield data were categorized into five yield classes, ranging from low- to high-yielding. The multispectral satellite imagery from PlanetScope's CubeSat, digital elevation model (DEM) data, and a landform map derived from the DEM were used as remotely sensed data layers. Five soil indices and seven vegetation indices (VI) were calculated from bare soil imagery (close to planting) and top-ofcanopy imagery (at peak growth). We employed three feature selection methods: Boruta algorithm, recursive feature elimination, and sequential feature selection. The Bayesian optimization approach was used for hyperparameter tuning of three machine learning (ML) classifiers: random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression. The best ML model was used to test the following two scenarios of yield prediction: (i) Year -fit - training with two years of data and predicting yield class of the third year; and (ii) Farm -fit - training with one field and predicting the yield of another field within the same farm on the same year. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that all feature selection methods consistently identified elevation, five VIs, and one soil index as important features. The random forest classifier model gave the best accuracy, with hyperparameters specific to each farm. The classification accuracies of Year -fit ranged from 64 to 80% for silage and 65 to 76% for grain. Farm -fit ranged from 66 to 82% for the silage and 77 to 82% for grain. The zone maps delineated from the predicted yield classes resulted in accuracies of 66 to 91% for Year -fit and 64 to 85% for Farm -fit. SIGNIFICANCE: These results underscore the signification of expanding yield class prediction to multiple years, offering a practical approach for enhancing zone delineation applications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maize grain and silage yield prediction of commercial fields using high-resolution UAS imagery
    Sunoj, S.
    Yeh, Benjamin
    Marcaida III, Manuel
    Longchamps, Louis
    van Aardt, Jan
    Ketterings, Quirine M.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2023, 235 : 137 - 149
  • [2] Exploring the Use of High-Resolution Satellite Images to Estimate Corn Silage Yield Within Field
    Subhashree, Srinivasagan N.
    Marcaida III, Manuel
    Sunoj, Shajahan
    Kindred, Daniel R.
    Thompson, Laura J.
    Ketterings, Quirine M.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [3] Corn Grain Yield Prediction Using UAV-based High Spatiotemporal Resolution Multispectral Imagery
    Killeen, Patrick
    Kiringa, Iluju
    Yeap, Tet
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS, ICDMW, 2022, : 1054 - 1062
  • [4] Coffee yield prediction using high-resolution satellite imagery and crop nutritional status in Southeast Brazil
    Zanella, Marco Antonio
    Martins, Rodrigo Nogueira
    da Silva, Fabio Moreira
    Carvalho, Luis Carlos Cirilo
    Alves, Marcelo de Carvalho
    Rosas, Jorge Tadeu Fim
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33
  • [5] Effect of high-resolution satellite and UAV imagery plot pixel resolution in wheat crop yield prediction
    Sangjan, Worasit
    Carter, Arron H.
    Pumphrey, Michael O.
    Hagemeyer, Kyall
    Jitkov, Vadim
    Sankaran, Sindhuja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 45 (05) : 1678 - 1698
  • [6] Mapping Cork Oak Mortality Using Multitemporal High-Resolution Satellite Imagery
    Catalao, Joao
    Navarro, Ana
    Calvao, Joao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [7] Using Low Resolution Satellite Imagery for Yield Prediction and Yield Anomaly Detection
    Rembold, Felix
    Atzberger, Clement
    Savin, Igor
    Rojas, Oscar
    REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 5 (04) : 1704 - 1733
  • [8] Evaluating high-resolution QuickBird satellite imagery for estimating cotton yield
    Yang, C.
    Everitt, J. H.
    Bradford, J. M.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2006, 49 (05): : 1599 - 1606
  • [9] Radiative transfer model inversion using high-resolution hyperspectral airborne imagery - Retrieving maize LAI to access biomass and grain yield
    Kayad, Ahmed
    Rodrigues Jr, Francelino A.
    Naranjo, Sergio
    Sozzi, Marco
    Pirotti, Francesco
    Marinello, Francesco
    Schulthess, Urs
    Defourny, Pierre
    Gerard, Bruno
    Weiss, Marie
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 282
  • [10] Prediction of Unpaved Road Conditions Using High-Resolution Optical Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning
    Workman, Robin
    Wong, Patrick
    Wright, Alex
    Wang, Zhao
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (16)