Investigating the Usefulness of Product Reviews Through Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

被引：0

作者：

Zafarghandi, Atefeh Keshavarzi ^{[1
]}

Qi, Ji ^{[2
]}

Hollink, Laura ^{[3
]}

Sang, Erik Tjong Kim ^{[2
]}

Ceolin, Davide ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[2] Netherlands eSci Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[3] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands

来源：

WEB ENGINEERING, ICWE 2024 | 2024年 / 14629卷

基金：

荷兰研究理事会;

关键词：

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks; Product Reviews; Review Usefulness; ACCEPTABILITY; HELPFULNESS;

D O I：

10.1007/978-3-031-62362-2_21

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

The importance of useful product reviews cannot be overstated, as they not only provide crucial information to potential buyers but also offer valuable feedback to the businesses or individuals under review. Providing useful reviews to consumers has gained significant attention as an effective market analysis tool for companies. Numerous studies have delved into the facets that contribute to predicting the usefulness of reviews, encompassing a spectrum from philosophical insights to advancements in artificial intelligence. In this work, we study how to use the argument structure of reviews to identify the most useful reviews in a set of annotated product reviews. In particular, we use quantitative bipolar argumentation frameworks (QBAFs) to construct a model of review arguments and topics, and we apply reasoning to such a model to identify useful reviews. Our results show that indeed argument reasoning, and QBAFs in particular, provide an insightful and well-performing means to analyze the usefulness of reviews.

引用

页码：296 / 308

页数：13

共 20 条

[1] Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Proietti, Carlo
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 : 41 - 52
[2] Generalising Semantics to Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Cordeiro, Renan
Alcantara, Joao
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PT I, 2022, 13653 : 520 - 534
[3] Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Chen, Weiwei
ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 335 : 87 - 102
[4] Probabilistic Bipolar Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Complexity Results
Fazzinga, Bettina
Flesca, Sergio
Furfaro, Filippo
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 1803 - 1809
[5] Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Chen, Weiwei
ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (335): : 87 - 102
[6] Coalitions of Arguments: A Tool for Handling Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Cayrol, Claudette
Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (01) : 83 - 109
[7] Information Overload and Argumentation Changes in Product Reviews: Evidence from NeuroIS
Popp, Florian
Lutz, Bernhard
Neumann, Dirk
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROIS RETREAT 2022, 2022, 58 : 9 - 21
[8] Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with a dual relation between defeat and defence
Alcantara, Joao
Cordeiro, Renan
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2024,
[9] Perceived Usefulness of Word-of-Mouth: An Analysis of Sentimentality in Product Reviews
Wang, Chih-Chien
Li, Ming-Zhe
Yang, Yolande Y. H.
MULTIDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL NETWORKS RESEARCH, MISNC 2015, 2015, 540 : 448 - 459
[10] Cyclic Supports in Recursive Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks: Semantics and LP Mapping
Alfano, Gianvincenzo
Greco, Sergio
Parisi, Francesco
Trubitsyna, Irina
THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING, 2024, 24 (04) : 921 - 941

← 1 2 →