Informal groups in EU foreign policy: a social network analysis

被引:3
作者
Vicere, Maria Giulia Amadio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] LUISS Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Rome, Italy
[2] European Univ Inst, Robert Schuman Ctr Adv Studies, Florence, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Informal groups; EU foreign policy; informal governance; Kosovo; Libya; Syria; EUROPEAN INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE; POWER; CONSENSUS; SECURITY; POLITICS; CRISIS; UNION; LAW;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2024.2367066
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
After decades of increasing integration and institutional development in EU foreign policy, the persistence of informal groups calls into question the understanding of European integration as a straight progressive line from informal to formal cooperation. Nonetheless, to date there is no systematic empirical knowledge of informal groups in EEC/EU foreign policy. To address this knowledge gap, the article offers an exploratory study. By means of social network analysis, it maps the frequency and types of informal groups in EEC/EU foreign policy in regard to Kosovo, Libya and Syria in three different phases of EEC/EU foreign policy integration. The article's findings show that the frequency of informal groups has remained fairly stable across the three phases of EEC/EU integration considered. At the same time, informal groups have generally been relatively small, like-minded, and dominated by individual member states. Overall, these results suggest that by accommodating member states' interests, especially those of powerful states and of states for which certain foreign policy issues are particularly salient, informal groups have provided the cooperation needed for the coherent functioning of the EEC/EU foreign policy system. While doing so, they have consolidated as socially meaningful patterns among member states' representatives.
引用
收藏
页码:1597 / 1624
页数:28
相关论文
共 99 条
[2]   International practices [J].
Adler, Emanuel ;
Pouliot, Vincent .
INTERNATIONAL THEORY, 2011, 3 (01) :1-36
[3]   New Directions in EU Foreign Policy Governance: Cross-loading, Leadership and Informal Groupings [J].
Aggestam, Lisbeth ;
Bicchi, Federica .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2019, 57 (03) :515-532
[4]   Learning to Lead? Germany and the Leadership Paradox in EU Foreign Policy [J].
Aggestam, Lisbeth ;
Hyde-Price, Adrian .
GERMAN POLITICS, 2020, 29 (01) :8-24
[5]   Lead Groups in EU Foreign Policy: The Cases of Iran and Ukraine [J].
Alcaro, Riccardo ;
Siddi, Marco .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 8 (02) :143-165
[6]  
Alcaro Riccardo., 2018, Europe and Iran's Nuclear Crisis: Lead Groups and EU Foreign Policy-Making
[7]  
Amadio Vicer G. M., 2018, HIGH REPRESENTATIVE
[8]  
Amadio Vicer G. M., 2023, CONTEMP SECUR POL, V44, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2145416, DOI 10.1080/13523260.2022.2145416]
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 4 MINISTERIAL M GROU
[10]   The High Representative and directoires in European foreign policy: the case of the nuclear negotiations with Iran [J].
Bassiri Tabrizi, Aniseh ;
Kienzle, Benjamin .
EUROPEAN SECURITY, 2020, 29 (03) :320-336