Electronic interventions in primary care to address substance use: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Villanueva-Blasco, Victor J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Eslava, Dalila [3 ,4 ,8 ]
Olave, Leticia [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Torrens, Marta [3 ,5 ,6 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Valencian Int Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, C-Pintor Sorolla 21, Valencia 46002, Spain
[2] Valencian Int Univ, Res Grp Hlth & Psychosocial Adjustment GI SAPS, Valencia, Spain
[3] Res Network Primary Addict Care RIAPAd, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Human Sci & Educ, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Neurosci Res Program, Addict Res Grp GRAd, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Vic, Cent Catalunya UCC, Sch Med, Vic, Spain
[7] Univ Int Valencia, C-Pintor Sorolla 21, Valencia 46002, Spain
[8] Univ Zaragoza, C-Valentin Cardera, Zaragoza 22003, Spain
[9] Valencian Int Univ, C Pintor Sorolla 21, Valencia 46002, Spain
[10] Pg Maritim Barceloneta 37-49, Barcelona 08003, Spain
关键词
Alcohol; Tobacco; Cannabis; Primary care; Electronic media; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INTERNET-DELIVERED TREATMENT; INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE; PERSON BRIEF INTERVENTION; SMOKING-CESSATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ALCOHOL MISUSE; MENTAL-HEALTH; USE DISORDERS; SOCIAL NORMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108073
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present systematic review aims to identify electronic interventions for addressing substance use and understand their effectiveness in primary care settings. A systematic search was carried out in the Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. The search included the keywords "electronic intervention", "substance use", "primary care" and synonyms. To determine the quality and recommendation of the analyzed interventions, the efficacy results reported by the studies were considered, as well as the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) assessment and the GRADE Evidence Assessment. Twenty-one electronic interventions in Primary Care were identified: internet, mobile or tablet applications, text messages, emails, automated telephone calls, or electronic self -reports. These interventions had diverse components, incorporating theories that have proven effective in face-to-face interventions as their theoretical frameworks. Some of them were complementary to in -person treatment, while others replaced it. Six interventions (28.5 %) displayed high quality: HealthCall, AB-CASI, Quit Genius, eCHECKUP-TOGO, CBI, and TES. Another nine interventions (42.8 %) were found to have moderate -high quality: Alcohol y Salud, IVR-BI, Program of Wallace et al., Let's Talk About Smoking, SMSalud, ESCAPE, AAC-ASPIRE, iQuit, and Programa VIH. One intervention (4.7 %) had moderate -low quality: Vive sin tabaco <inverted exclamation>Decidete! The remaining five interventions (23.8 %) were found to have very low quality: Connection to health, cSBI, Teen Well Check, the program of Helzer et al. (2008), and Down your drink. The programs with the highest recommendation for addressing alcohol -related issues are HealthCall and AB-CASI; for tobacco use, it is Quit Genius; for cannabis use, it is eCHECKUP-TOGO; for addressing both legal and illegal substances, it is CBI and TES. Finally, for specific illicit drug use, the only recommended program is CBI. This last intervention, CBI, is of the highest quality and, therefore, can be considered a model intervention for dissemination in the primary care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regarding "Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review"
    Edwards, Samuel T.
    Peterson, Kim
    Helfand, Mark
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (07) : 994 - 994
  • [42] A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care
    Rebecca Reynolds
    Sarah Dennis
    Iqbal Hasan
    Jan Slewa
    Winnie Chen
    David Tian
    Sangeetha Bobba
    Nicholas Zwar
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [43] DELAYING AND REVERSING FRAILTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PRIMARY CARE INTERVENTIONS
    Travers, John
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    Bailey, Jade
    Cooney, Therese
    AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47
  • [44] A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care
    Reynolds, Rebecca
    Dennis, Sarah
    Hasan, Iqbal
    Slewa, Jan
    Chen, Winnie
    Tian, David
    Bobba, Sangeetha
    Zwar, Nicholas
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [45] MULTIDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTIONS FOR MULTISITE OSTEOARTHRITIS IN PRIMARY CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Finney, A.
    Healey, E.
    Ryan, S.
    Jordan, J.
    Dziedzic, K.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 : S190 - S191
  • [46] Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
    Travers, John
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    Bailey, Jade
    Cooney, Marie-Therese
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (678): : E61 - E69
  • [47] A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
    Paneque, Milena
    Turchetti, Daniela
    Jackson, Leigh
    Lunt, Peter
    Houwink, Elisa
    Skirton, Heather
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17
  • [48] Regarding “Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review”
    Samuel T. Edwards
    Kim Peterson
    Mark Helfand
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 994 - 994
  • [49] Effects of educational interventions on primary dementia care: A systematic review
    Perry, M.
    Draskovic, I.
    Lucassen, P.
    Vernooij-Dassen, M.
    van Achterberg, T.
    Rikkert, M. Olde
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [50] Systematic review into city interventions to address obesity
    Danielli, Shaun
    Coffey, Tom
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 32