Lexicographic optimization-based planning for stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases

被引:0
作者
Trivellato, Sara [1 ]
Caricato, Paolo [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Pellegrini, Roberto [3 ]
Daniotti, Martina Camilla [1 ,2 ]
Bianchi, Sofia [4 ,5 ]
Bordigoni, Bianca [1 ]
Carminati, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Faccenda, Valeria [1 ]
Panizza, Denis [1 ,4 ]
Montanari, Gianluca [1 ]
Arcangeli, Stefano [4 ,5 ]
De Ponti, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo Tintori, Med Phys Dept, Monza, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Phys, Milan, Italy
[3] Elekta AB, Med Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo Tintori, Radiat Oncol Dept, Monza, Italy
[6] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Padua, Italy
关键词
Lexicographic optimization; Automated planning; Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery; Brain metastases; Coplanar arcs; Plan quality; QUALITY; COPLANAR; FRACTION; SRS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110308
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To validate a fully-automated lexicographic optimization-planning system (mCycle, Elekta) for single-(SL) and multiple-(ML, up to 4 metastases) lesions in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, 21 Gy, single fraction). Methods: A pre-determined priority list, Wish-List (WL), represents a dialogue between planner and clinician, establishing strict constraints and pursuing objectives. In order to satisfy the clinical protocol without manual intervention, four patients were required to tweak and fine-tune each WL (SLp, MLp) for coplanar arcs. Thirtyfive testing plans (20 SLp, 15 MLp) were automatically re-planned (mCP). Automatic and manual plans were compared including dose constraints, conformality, modulation complexity score (MCS), delivery time, and local gamma analysis (2%/2 mm). To ensure plan clinical acceptability, two radiation oncologists conducted an independent blind plan choice. Results: Each WL-tuning took 3 days. Estimated median manual plans and mCP calculation time were 8 and 3 h, respectively. Significant increases in SLp and MLp target coverage and conformity were registered. mCP showed a not significant and clinically acceptable higher median brain V12 Gy. SLp registered a -5.8% MU decrease with comparable median delivery time (MP 2.0 min, mCP 1.9 min) while MLp showed a +9.8% MU increase and longer delivery time (MP 3.5 min, mCP 4.4 min). mCP MCS resulted significantly higher without affecting gamma passing rates. At blind choice, mCP were preferred in the majority of cases. Conclusions: Lexicographic optimization produced acceptable SRS plans with coplanar arcs significantly reducing the overall planning time in cases with up to 4 brain metastases. These planning improvements suggest further investigations by setting high-quality non-coplanar arc plans as a reference.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[41]   Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study [J].
Yamamoto, Masaaki ;
Serizawa, Toru ;
Shuto, Takashi ;
Akabane, Atsuya ;
Higuchi, Yoshinori ;
Kawagishi, Jun ;
Yamanaka, Kazuhiro ;
Sato, Yasunori ;
Jokura, Hidefumi ;
Yomo, Shoji ;
Nagano, Osamu ;
Kenai, Hiroyuki ;
Moriki, Akihito ;
Suzuki, Satoshi ;
Kida, Yoshihisa ;
Iwai, Yoshiyasu ;
Hayashi, Motohiro ;
Onishi, Hiroaki ;
Gondo, Masazumi ;
Sato, Mitsuya ;
Akimitsu, Tomohide ;
Kubo, Kenji ;
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro ;
Shibasaki, Toru ;
Goto, Tomoaki ;
Takanashi, Masami ;
Mori, Yoshimasa ;
Takakura, Kintomo ;
Saeki, Naokatsu ;
Kunieda, Etsuo ;
Aoyama, Hidefumi ;
Momoshima, Suketaka ;
Tsuchiya, Kazuhiro .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) :387-395
[42]   Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments [J].
Yu, Suhong ;
Xu, Huijun ;
Zhang, Yin ;
Zhang, Xin ;
Dyer, Michael ;
Hirsch, Ariel ;
Tam Truong, Minh ;
Zhen, Heming .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (03) :48-54
[43]   Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans [J].
Zhang, Shuming ;
Yang, Ruijie ;
Wang, Xin .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (11) :104-110