Lexicographic optimization-based planning for stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases

被引:0
作者
Trivellato, Sara [1 ]
Caricato, Paolo [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Pellegrini, Roberto [3 ]
Daniotti, Martina Camilla [1 ,2 ]
Bianchi, Sofia [4 ,5 ]
Bordigoni, Bianca [1 ]
Carminati, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
Faccenda, Valeria [1 ]
Panizza, Denis [1 ,4 ]
Montanari, Gianluca [1 ]
Arcangeli, Stefano [4 ,5 ]
De Ponti, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo Tintori, Med Phys Dept, Monza, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Phys, Milan, Italy
[3] Elekta AB, Med Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Sch Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS San Gerardo Tintori, Radiat Oncol Dept, Monza, Italy
[6] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Padua, Italy
关键词
Lexicographic optimization; Automated planning; Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery; Brain metastases; Coplanar arcs; Plan quality; QUALITY; COPLANAR; FRACTION; SRS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110308
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To validate a fully-automated lexicographic optimization-planning system (mCycle, Elekta) for single-(SL) and multiple-(ML, up to 4 metastases) lesions in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, 21 Gy, single fraction). Methods: A pre-determined priority list, Wish-List (WL), represents a dialogue between planner and clinician, establishing strict constraints and pursuing objectives. In order to satisfy the clinical protocol without manual intervention, four patients were required to tweak and fine-tune each WL (SLp, MLp) for coplanar arcs. Thirtyfive testing plans (20 SLp, 15 MLp) were automatically re-planned (mCP). Automatic and manual plans were compared including dose constraints, conformality, modulation complexity score (MCS), delivery time, and local gamma analysis (2%/2 mm). To ensure plan clinical acceptability, two radiation oncologists conducted an independent blind plan choice. Results: Each WL-tuning took 3 days. Estimated median manual plans and mCP calculation time were 8 and 3 h, respectively. Significant increases in SLp and MLp target coverage and conformity were registered. mCP showed a not significant and clinically acceptable higher median brain V12 Gy. SLp registered a -5.8% MU decrease with comparable median delivery time (MP 2.0 min, mCP 1.9 min) while MLp showed a +9.8% MU increase and longer delivery time (MP 3.5 min, mCP 4.4 min). mCP MCS resulted significantly higher without affecting gamma passing rates. At blind choice, mCP were preferred in the majority of cases. Conclusions: Lexicographic optimization produced acceptable SRS plans with coplanar arcs significantly reducing the overall planning time in cases with up to 4 brain metastases. These planning improvements suggest further investigations by setting high-quality non-coplanar arc plans as a reference.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Pre-clinical validation of a novel system for fully-automated treatment planning [J].
Bijman, Rik ;
Sharfo, Abdul Wahab ;
Rossi, Linda ;
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Heijmen, Ben .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 158 :253-261
[2]   Evaluation of fully automated a priori MCO treatment planning in VMAT for head-and-neck cancer [J].
Biston, Marie-Claude ;
Costea, Madalina ;
Gassa, Frederic ;
Serre, Anne-Agathe ;
Voet, Peter ;
Larson, Randy ;
Gregoire, Vincent .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 :31-38
[3]   iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Storchi, Pascal R. M. ;
Voet, Peter W. J. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) :951-963
[4]   Updating approach for lexicographic optimization-based planning to improve cervical cancer plan quality [J].
Caricato, Paolo ;
Trivellato, Sara ;
Pellegrini, Roberto ;
Montanari, Gianluca ;
Daniotti, Martina Camilla ;
Bordigoni, Bianca ;
Faccenda, Valeria ;
Panizza, Denis ;
Meregalli, Sofia ;
Bonetto, Elisa ;
Voet, Peter ;
Arcangeli, Stefano ;
De Ponti, Elena .
DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (01)
[5]   Template-based automation of treatment planning in advanced radiotherapy: a comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation [J].
Cilla, Savino ;
Ianiro, Anna ;
Romano, Carmela ;
Deodato, Francesco ;
Macchia, Gabriella ;
Buwenge, Milly ;
Dinapoli, Nicola ;
Boldrini, Luca ;
Morganti, Alessio G. ;
Valentini, Vincenzo .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[6]  
Cui GQ, 2022, J RADIOSURGERY SBRT, V8, P47
[7]   Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases with Coplanar Arcs: A Dosimetric and Clinical Analysis [J].
Faccenda, Valeria ;
Panizza, Denis ;
Pisoni, Valerio ;
Trivellato, Sara ;
Daniotti, Martina Camilla ;
Bianchi, Sofia Paola ;
De Ponti, Elena ;
Arcangeli, Stefano .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
[8]   High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC): An Overview [J].
Grimm, Jimm ;
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Jackson, Andrew ;
Kavanagh, Brian D. ;
Xue, Jinyu ;
Yorke, Ellen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 110 (01) :1-10
[9]   ISRS Technical Guidelines for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Treatment of Small Brain Metastases (≤1 cm in Diameter) [J].
Grishchuk, Diana ;
Dimitriadis, Alexis ;
Sahgal, Arjun ;
De Salles, Antonio ;
Fariselli, Laura ;
Kotecha, Rupesh ;
Levivier, Marc ;
Ma, Lijun ;
Pollock, Bruce E. ;
Regis, Jean ;
Sheehan, Jason ;
Suh, John ;
Yomo, Shoji ;
Paddick, Ian .
PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13 (03) :183-194
[10]   Plan quality in radiotherapy treatment planning - Review of the factors and challenges [J].
Hansen, Christian Ronn ;
Hussein, Mohammad ;
Bernchou, Uffe ;
Zukauskaite, Ruta ;
Thwaites, David .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 66 (02) :267-278