Causal effects between gut microbiota and endometriosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study

被引:0
|
作者
Cao, Tiefeng [1 ]
Wang, Yunfei [2 ]
Huimin, Shen [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gynaecol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gut microbiota; endometriosis; Mendelian randomisation; DISEASE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2024.2362415
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundPrevious observational evidence has indicated the potential involvement of the gut microbiota (GM) in the development of endometriosis. However, the causal relationship of the association remains to be investigated.MethodGenome-wide association study (GWAS) data of GM was obtained from the MiBioGen consortium, and GWAS for endometriosis data was from the FinnGen consortium. Initially, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was performed to identify specific bacteria associated with endometriosis. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW) was used as the main MR analysis to infer causal relationships. The other four popular MR methods including MR-Egger regression, weighted mode, weighted median, and simple mode were used for secondary confirmation. Subsequently, these selected bacteria were employed as exposure to investigate their causal effects on six sub-types of endometriosis. Furthermore, reverse MR analysis was implemented to evaluate the reverse causal effects. Cochran's Q statistics was used to test the heterogeneity of instrumental variables (IVs); MR-Egger regression was used to test horizontal pleiotropy; MR-PRESSO and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were applied to find significant outliers.ResultA total of 1131 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were collected as IVs for 196 GM taxa with endometriosis as the outcome. We identified 12 causal relationships between endometriosis and GM taxa including 1 phylum, 3 families, 2 orders, and 6 genera (Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, Eubacterium ruminantium group, Faecalibacterium, Peptococcus, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, and Ruminococcaceae UCG005). Utilizing the Bonferroni method, we identified phylum Cyanobacteria as the strongest associated GM taxa. Subsequently, 6 significant causal effects were uncovered between the 12 selected specific GM and 6 sub-types of endometriosis. Meanwhile, no reverse causal relationship was found. Further, no horizontal pleiotropy and no significant outliers were detected in the sensitive analysis.ConclusionsThis MR analysis revealed significant causal effects between GM and endometriosis and phylum Cyanobacteria had the strongest association. The imbalance of gut microbiota (GM) is suggested to be involved in the development of endometriosis while the causal relationship between GM and endometriosis remains undetermined. This two-sample mendelian randomisation analysis firstly demonstrated the potential association between GM and the risk of endometriosis including 6 sub-types. We revealed 12 causal relationships between endometriosis and GM taxa including 1 phylum, 3 families, 2 orders, and 6 genera while Phylum Cyanobacteria was the strongest associated GM taxa by using Bonferroni method. Meanwhile, we identified 6 significant causal effects between 12 selected specific GM and 6 sub-types of endometriosis. Meanwhile, the result from reverse MR analysis showed that there was no causal effect of endometriosis on the identified specific GM taxa. Thus, we revealed the causal relationship between GM and endometriosis. It is necessary to further study its potential mechanism, which may contribute to the prevention and treatment of Endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring the Causal Effects of Gut Microbiota on Diabetic Nephropathy: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
    Chen, Kai
    Wang, Xu
    Shang, Zhihao
    Li, Qingyue
    Yao, Wenqiang
    Guo, Shaobo
    Guan, Yingting
    COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING, 2024,
  • [22] Causal relationship between gut microbiota and rosacea: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Li, Jiaqi
    Yang, Fengjuan
    Liu, Yuling
    Jiang, Xian
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [23] The causal relationship between gut microbiota and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    He, Nan
    Sheng, Kai
    Li, Guangzhao
    Zhang, Shenghuan
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] The causal relationship between gut microbiota and leukemia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Chen, Guanjun
    Kuang, Zheshu
    Li, Fan
    Li, Jianchang
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [25] Two-sample Mendelian randomization to study the causal association between gut microbiota and atherosclerosis
    Jiang, Shijiu
    Yu, Cheng
    Lv, Bingjie
    He, Shaolin
    Zheng, Yuqi
    Yang, Wenling
    Wang, Boyuan
    Li, Dazhu
    Lin, Jibin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [26] Causal Association between Iritis or Uveitis and Glaucoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study
    Seo, Je Hyun
    Lee, Young
    GENES, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [27] Causal associations between gut microbiota and sepsis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    You, Jingya
    Bi, Xiaogang
    Zhang, Kouxing
    Xie, Dan
    Chai, Yiwen
    Wen, Sha
    Xian, Ying
    Fan, Min
    Xu, Wen
    Li, Mingliang
    Yuan, Xiaofeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2023,
  • [28] The causal effects between gut microbiota and hemorrhagic stroke: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Shen, Yingjie
    Liu, Hao
    Meng, Xiangyi
    Gao, Aili
    Liu, Yansong
    Ma, Wei
    Liang, Hongsheng
    Hu, Fulan
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] Causal effects of gut microbiota on erectile dysfunction: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Zhang, Yuyang
    Chen, Yuxi
    Mei, Yangyang
    Xu, Renfang
    Zhang, Hong
    Feng, Xingliang
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [30] Causal Effects of the Gut Microbiota on Cerebral Infarction: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
    Tian, S. J.
    Yu, T. X.
    Xue, J.
    Li, X. N.
    Jin, Y.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2025, 61 (03) : 282 - 288