Dynamic nexus between natural resource rents, economic growth, and environmental quality: A comparative study between China and the US

被引:0
作者
Wang, Daohua [1 ]
Niu, Ziheng [2 ]
Li, Ning [3 ]
Zhang, Yu [4 ]
Zou, Zongsen [4 ]
机构
[1] Rizhao Polytech, Dept Architectural Engn, Rizhao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Wulian Rural Commercial Bank Co Ltd, Rizhao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Qufu Normal Univ, Sch Econ, 80 Yantai North Rd, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
China; ecological footprint; economic growth; NARDL; natural resource rents; the US; CURSE; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1111/1477-8947.12528
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic development and environmental sustainability have recently become global priorities. This study utilizes the nonlinear autoregressive distribution lag model (NARDL) to investigate the asymmetric effects of natural resource rents on economic growth and environmental quality in China and the United States from 1970 to 2020. The findings indicate that natural resource rents exert asymmetric effects on economic growth and environmental quality in both countries; however, the impact patterns differ between the two countries. In the short term, a decrease in natural resource rents significantly increases GDP per capita in the US, while an increase in natural resource rents has no effect. Moreover, natural resource rents do not influence the ecological footprint in the US. By contrast, China's GDP per capita remains unaffected by natural resource rents, while the ecological footprint is significantly influenced by both positive and negative changes in natural resource rents, exhibiting asymmetric impacts. In the long run, an increase in natural resource rents significantly impacts both GDP per capita and the ecological footprint in the US, while a decrease only impacts the ecological footprint. By contrast, both increases and decreases in natural resource rents impact per capita GDP and the ecological footprint in China. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring country-specific policies to facilitate sustainable economic development and enhance environmental quality.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China [J].
Afshan, Sahar ;
Yaqoob, Tanzeela .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (33) :50675-50685
[2]   Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Asghar, Muhammad Mansoor ;
Malik, Muhammad Nasir ;
Nawaz, Kishwar .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 67
[3]  
Akpan G., 2014, J EC SUSTAIN DEV, V5, P44
[4]   Financialization, natural resources rents and environmental sustainability dynamics in Saudi Arabia under high and low regimes [J].
Alfalih, Abdulaziz Abdulmohsen ;
Hadj, Tarek Bel .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 76
[5]   An assessment of the economic impact of natural resource rents in kingdom of Saudi Arabia [J].
Aljarallah, Ruba A. .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 72
[6]   Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions [J].
Alvarado, Rafael ;
Tillaguango, Brayan ;
Dagar, Vishal ;
Ahmad, Munir ;
Isik, Cem ;
Mendez, Priscila ;
Toledo, Elisa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 318
[7]   Do Natural Resources Depress Income Per Capita? [J].
Arezki, Rabah ;
van der Ploeg, Frederick .
REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2011, 15 (03) :504-521
[8]   Savings, growth and the resource curse hypothesis [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Hamilton, K .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 31 (11) :1793-1807
[9]   How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? [J].
Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Roubaud, David ;
Farhani, Sahbi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 :356-367
[10]  
BEHBUDI DAVOOD, 2010, Journal of Economic Development, V35, P81