Representation in International Relations, Impeachment of the President of Georgia, and European Integration

被引:0
作者
Gegenava, Dimitry [1 ]
Goradze, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Sulkhan Saba Orbeliani Univ, K Kutateladze 3, Tbilisi 0186, Georgia
来源
TALTECH JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN STUDIES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
constitutional court; European integration; Georgia; government; impeachment; president; representation;
D O I
10.2478/bjes-2024-0011
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The 2017-2018 constitutional reform amended the Constitution of Georgia and changed the political system of the country. The president has the responsibility to represent the country in international relations, but only with the approval of the government. Constitutional norms are not specific, leaving room for different interpretations. Article 78 of the Constitution obliges constitutional bodies to use all measures for European integration. Under this constitutional obligation, the president met with European colleagues, though without governmental approval. This provoked the ruling party to initiate the process of impeachment. The Constitutional Court of Georgia concluded that the president breached the Constitution, but the parliament could not impeach the president. The paper analyses the role of presidential representation in international relations and its constitutional responsibility in the light of Georgia's European aspirations.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 252
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, Constitutional Reference no. 1797 of Members of the Parliament of Georgia (Irakli Kobakhidze, Shalva Papuashvili, Mamuka Mdinaradze and others (80 members)), DOI [10.4324/9781003368427-4, DOI 10.4324/9781003368427-4]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2023, Conclusion no. 3/1/1797 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia on Constitutional Reference of the Members of the Parliament of Georgia (Irakli Kobakhidze, Shalva Papuashvili, Mamuka Mdinaradze and others (80 members)) on the issue of violation of the Constitution of Georgia by the President of Georgia
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Dissenting Opinion of the Members of the Constitutional Court of Georgia-Irine Imerlishvili, Giorgi Kverenchkhiladze, and Teimuraz Tughushi Regarding the Conclusion 3/1/1797 of 16 October 2023 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, Introduction to Georgian Constitutional Law, V2nd
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2023, Amicus Curiae
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, Venice Commission
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, Decision1/1/549 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2012, Rulingno.1/3/523 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, CDL-AD(2017) 023-e, Opinion 876/2017
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, Rulingno.2/2/486 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia of 12 July 2010 in the case Nonentrepreneurial (Non-commercial) Legal Entity "National League for Protection of the Constitution" v. the Parliament of Georgia