Shock index to predict outcomes in patients with trauma following traffic collisions: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Liao, Te-Kai [1 ]
Ho, Chung-Han [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Ying-Jia [2 ]
Cheng, Li-Chin [1 ,4 ]
Huang, Hsuan-Yi [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Traumatol, 901 Zhonghua Rd, Tainan 710, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Med Res Dept, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Southern Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Informat Management, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Ctr Gen Educ, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
Patient outcomes; Shock index; Traffic collision; Youden index; MASSIVE TRANSFUSION; BLOOD-TRANSFUSION; MORTALITY; UTILITY; HEMOSTASIS; CARE; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-024-02545-4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose Taiwan, which has a rate of high vehicle ownership, faces significant challenges in managing trauma caused by traffic collisions. In Taiwan, traffic collisions contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality, with a high incidence of severe bleeding trauma. The shock index (SI) and the modified shock index (MSI) have been proposed as early indicators of hemodynamic instability. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of SI and MSI in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with trauma following traffic collisions.Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chi Mei Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. The comprehensive analysis included 662 patients, with data collected on vital signs and outcomes such as mortality, blood transfusion, emergent surgical intervention (ESI), transarterial embolization (TAE), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Optimal cutoff points for SI and MSI were identified by calculating the Youden index. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess outcomes, adjusting for demographic and injury severity variables.Results An SI threshold of 1.11 was associated with an increased risk of mortality, while an SI of 0.84 predicted the need for blood transfusion in the context of traffic collisions. Both SI and MSI demonstrated high predictive power for mortality and blood transfusion, with acceptable accuracy for TAE, ESI, and ICU admission. Logistic regression analyses confirmed the independence of SI and MSI as risk factors for adverse outcomes, thus, providing valuable insights into their clinical utility.Conclusions SI and MSI are valuable tools for predicting mortality and blood transfusion needs in patients with trauma due to traffic collisions. These findings advance the quality of care for patients with trauma during their transition from the emergency room to the ICU, facilitating prompt and reliable decision-making processes and improving the care of patients with trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:2191 / 2198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adding age-adjusted shock index to the American College of Surgeons' trauma team activation criteria to predict severe injury in children
    McCormick, Taylor
    Haukoos, Jason
    Hopkins, Emily
    Trent, Stacy
    Adelgais, Kathleen
    Cohen, Mitchell
    Gausche-Hill, Marianne
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2023, 94 (02) : 295 - 303
  • [22] Shock Index for Early Detection of Low Plasma Fibrinogen in Trauma: A Prospective Observational Cohort Pilot Study
    Skola, Josef
    Bilska, Marcela
    Horakova, Michala
    Tegl, Vaclav
    Benes, Jan
    Skulec, Roman
    Cerny, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [23] Impact of trauma centre designation level on outcomes following hemorrhagic shock: a multicentre cohort study
    Dufresne, Philippe
    Moore, Lynne
    Tardif, Pier-Alexandre
    Razek, Tarek
    Omar, Madiba
    Boutin, Amelie
    Clement, Julien
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 60 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [24] Risk factors for death in septic shock A retrospective cohort study comparing trauma and non-trauma patients
    Medam, Sophie
    Zieleskiewicz, Laurent
    Duclos, Gary
    Baumstarck, Karine
    Loundou, Anderson
    Alingrin, Julie
    Hammad, Emmanuelle
    Vigne, Coralie
    Antonini, Francois
    Leone, Marc
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (50)
  • [25] The impact of age and receipt antihypertensives to systolic blood pressure and shock index at injury scene and in the emergency department to predict massive transfusion in trauma patients
    Park, Se Jin
    Lee, Mi Jin
    Kim, Changho
    Jung, Haewon
    Kim, Seong Hun
    Nho, Wooyoung
    Seo, Kang Suk
    Park, Jungbae
    Ryoo, Hyun Wook
    Ahn, Jae Yun
    Moon, Sungbae
    Cho, Jae Wan
    Son, Shin-ah
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 29 (01)
  • [26] Shock Index as a Predictor of Morbidity and Mortality in Pediatric Trauma Patients
    Strutt, Jonathan
    Flood, Andrew
    Kharbanda, Anupam B.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2019, 35 (02) : 132 - 137
  • [27] Shock Index and Decreased Level of Consciousness as Terminal Cancer Patients' Survival Time Predictors: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Sato, Ko
    Yokoi, Hideto
    Tsuneto, Satoru
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 220 - +
  • [28] Abnormal shock index exposure and clinical outcomes among critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort analysis
    Maheshwari, Kamal
    Nathanson, Brian H.
    Munson, Sibyl H.
    Hwang, Seungyoung
    Yapici, Halit O.
    Stevens, Mitali
    Ruiz, Carlos
    Hunley, Charles F.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 57 : 5 - 12
  • [29] Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study
    Isogai, Toshiaki
    Okada, Akira
    Morita, Kojiro
    Michihata, Nobuaki
    Makito, Kanako
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 149 (04) : 314 - 324
  • [30] The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system
    Kuo, Spencer C. H.
    Kuo, Pao-Jen
    Hsu, Shiun-Yuan
    Rau, Cheng-Shyuan
    Chen, Yi-Chun
    Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun
    Hsieh, Ching-Hua
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):