Open science practices in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: A path to enhanced transparency and collaboration

被引:6
作者
Ng, Jeremy Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wieland, L. Susan [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lee, Myeong Soo [7 ]
Liu, Jian-ping [8 ]
Witt, Claudia M. [5 ,6 ]
Moher, David [3 ,9 ]
Cramer, Holger [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Gen Practice & Interprofess Care, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Bosch Hlth Campus, Robert Bosch Ctr Integrat Med & Hlth, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ctr Journalol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Maryland, Ctr Integrat Med, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Complementary & Integrat Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[7] Korea Inst Oriental Med, KM Sci Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[8] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Ctr Evidence Based Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Complementary and integrative medicine; Open science; Open science practices; Research transparency; Traditional medicine; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; PATIENT PRIVACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.imr.2024.101047
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
This educational article explores the convergence of open science practices and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM), shedding light on the potential benefits and challenges of open science for the development, dissemination, and implementation of evidence-based TCIM. We emphasize the transformative shift in medical science towards open and collaborative practices, highlighting the limited application of open science in TCIM research despite its growing acceptance among patients. We define open science practices and discuss those that are applicable to TCIM, including: study registration; reporting guidelines; data, code and material sharing; preprinting; publishing open access; and reproducibility/replication studies. We explore the benefits of open science in TCIM, spanning improved research quality, increased public trust, accelerated innovation, and enhanced evidence-based decision-making. We also acknowledge challenges such as data privacy concerns, limited resources, and resistance to cultural change. We propose strategies to overcome these challenges, including ethical guidelines, education programs, funding advocacy, interdisciplinary dialogue, and patient engagement. Looking to the future, we envision the maturation of open science in TCIM, the development of TCIM-specific guidelines for open science practices, advancements in data sharing platforms, the integration of open data and artificial intelligence in TCIM research, and changes in the context of policy and regulation. We foresee a future where open science in TCIM leads to a better evidence base, informed decision-making, interdisciplinary collaboration, and transformative impacts on healthcare and research methodologies, highlighting the promising synergy between open science and TCIM for holistic, evidence-based healthcare solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Barba LA, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1802.03311
[2]   Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science [J].
Aarts, Alexander A. ;
Anderson, Joanna E. ;
Anderson, Christopher J. ;
Attridge, Peter R. ;
Attwood, Angela ;
Axt, Jordan ;
Babel, Molly ;
Bahnik, Stepan ;
Baranski, Erica ;
Barnett-Cowan, Michael ;
Bartmess, Elizabeth ;
Beer, Jennifer ;
Bell, Raoul ;
Bentley, Heather ;
Beyan, Leah ;
Binion, Grace ;
Borsboom, Denny ;
Bosch, Annick ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Bowman, Sara D. ;
Brandt, Mark J. ;
Braswell, Erin ;
Brohmer, Hilmar ;
Brown, Benjamin T. ;
Brown, Kristina ;
Bruening, Jovita ;
Calhoun-Sauls, Ann ;
Callahan, Shannon P. ;
Chagnon, Elizabeth ;
Chandler, Jesse ;
Chartier, Christopher R. ;
Cheung, Felix ;
Christopherson, Cody D. ;
Cillessen, Linda ;
Clay, Russ ;
Cleary, Hayley ;
Cloud, Mark D. ;
Cohn, Michael ;
Cohoon, Johanna ;
Columbus, Simon ;
Cordes, Andreas ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet ;
Cremata, Ed ;
Crusius, Jan ;
DeCoster, Jamie ;
DeGaetano, Michelle A. ;
Della Penna, Nicolas ;
den Bezemer, Bobby ;
Deserno, Marie K. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
[3]   Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing A Survey Among Members of the German Psychological Society [J].
Abele-Brehm, Andrea E. ;
Gollwitzer, Mario ;
Steinberg, Ulf ;
Schoenbrodt, Felix D. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 50 (04) :252-260
[4]  
Allen C, 2019, PLOS BIOL, V17, DOI [10.1186/s13048-023-01233-y, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246]
[5]  
Alston J.M., 2021, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, V102, pe01801, DOI DOI 10.1002/BES2.1801
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Implementing Reproducible Research
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: whats in a name?
[10]  
ASAPbio, 2023, PREPRINT