From Physics to Project Management: A Multi-Domain Matrix Model for the Distributed Analysis of Nuclear Fusion Systems

被引:0
作者
Beernaert, Torben [1 ,5 ]
Verlaan, Ad [2 ]
Etman, Pascal [3 ]
Giesen, Peter [2 ]
van Beekum, Erik [2 ]
Ribeiro, Mariana
Bola, Ines [4 ]
Moser, Lucas [5 ]
de Bock, Maarten [5 ]
Classen, Ivo [1 ]
de Baar, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Dutch Inst Fundamental Energy Res DIFFER, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Stieltjesweg 1, NL-2628 CK Delft, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Act Space Technol SA, P-3045508 Coimbra, Portugal
[5] ITER Org, Route Vinon Sur Verdon CS 90 046, F-13067 St Paul Les Durance, France
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL DSM CONFERENCE, DSM 2023 | 2023年
关键词
Multi-Domain Matrix; Systems Engineering; Nuclear Fusion; Project Management; Complexity; DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX; EXTENSIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Nuclear fusion reactors operate in extreme and complex physical regimes. Predicting the behavior of these systems is essential for verification and validation, but requires the integration of diverse analysis activities, constrained by domains such as cost and human resources or availability of analysis tools. In this paper, we explore the use of a Multi-Domain Matrix (MDM) to formalize cross-domain aspects in the planning and coordination of such complex analysis campaigns. We represent the engineered system as a matrix of physical effects and the analysis campaign as matrix of activities. From the mapping between these domains, we can identify missing aspects, prioritize activities and derive which critical assumptions. Sequencing the model improves the planning. We apply the proposed method to a diagnostic shutter, a common subsystem in next-generation nuclear fusion reactors. The MDM successfully supports planning of multiple analysis activities, and suggests that it can be expanded to more domains.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Borst P., 1995, Working Papers of the Ninth International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning QR95, P11
  • [2] Braspenning N. C. W. M., 2008, Model-based integration and testing of high-tech multi-disciplinary systems
  • [3] Design Structure Matrix Extensions and Innovations: A Survey and New Opportunities
    Browning, Tyson R.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 63 (01) : 27 - 52
  • [4] Drave I., 2020, P 23 ACM IEEE INT C, DOI [10.1145/3365438.3410938, DOI 10.1145/3365438.3410938]
  • [5] Improving the systems engineering process with multilevel analysis of interactions
    Eppinger, Steven D.
    Joglekar, Nitin R.
    Olechowski, Alison
    Teo, Terence
    [J]. AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2014, 28 (04): : 323 - 337
  • [6] Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes
    Lambe, Andrew B.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 46 (02) : 273 - 284
  • [7] Mathias Johannes, 2011, INT C ENG DESIGN
  • [8] Maurer M, 2008, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P2486
  • [9] Ramsaier M., 2020, P DES SOC DES C, V1, P1057, DOI [10.1017/dsd.2020.32, DOI 10.1017/DSD.2020.32]
  • [10] Rogers J., 1998, 7 AIAA USAF NASA ISS, DOI [10.2514/6.1998-4706, DOI 10.2514/6.1998-4706]