Diversity through adversity: Adjustment profiles and protective factors of sexual and gender minority students in Portuguese schools

被引:1
作者
Fernandes, Telmo [1 ,2 ]
Vazquez, Ines [2 ]
Gato, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Ctr Psychol Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Rua Alfredo Allen, P-4200135 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Adjustment profiles; Cluster analysis; Protective factors; School climate; POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT; BULLYING-VICTIMIZATION; MENTAL-HEALTH; PEER VICTIMIZATION; QUEER YOUTH; GAY; RISK; TRANSGENDER; RESILIENCE; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107569
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Negative school experiences, such as bullying, compromise the well-being and mental health of adolescents, particularly those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, or questioning (LGBTQ + ). The aim of the current study was to identify different profiles of psychological adjustment among students according to their exposure to risk (higher levels of bullying victimization) and evidence of psychological adjustment (lower levels of anxiety), as well as to compare these profiles in relation to (i) participants ' age and sexual and gender identity, and (ii) internal and external protective resources. The study used data collected by the FREE research project in Portugal through an online questionnaire among 1,169 students, with a mean age of 16.2 years ( SD = 1.20), of which 47.1 % identified as LGBTQ +. Four adjustment profiles were identified: unchallenged, resilient, distressed, and at -risk. Sexual and gender minority students, particularly those who identify as trans and nonbinary, were overrepresented in the maladjusted profiles (at -risk and distressed) and underrepresented in the normative profile (unchallenged). Furthermore, internal resources such as a higher self-esteem and lower levels of sexual identity concealment seemed to have a protective effect. Students ' acceptance of LGBTQ + students and perception that school was safe for LGBTQ + students revealed a protective effect for all students, whereas teachers ' acceptance and access to school information and support for LGBTQ + issues revealed a protective effect for sexual and gender minority students only. Implications for the improvement of school climate and intervention with students and teachers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Lawno.9/2010
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, LGBTQI Inclusive Education Report 2022, VSecond
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Lawno.38/2018
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex people covering events that occurred in europe and central asia
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Law no. 51/2012
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Lawno.7/2011
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Law no. 2/2016
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Diario da Republica: I serie
[9]   Stay away or stay together? Social contagion, common identity, and bystanders' interventions in homophobic bullying episodes [J].
Antonio, Raquel ;
Guerra, Rita ;
Moleiro, Carla .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2020, 23 (01) :127-139
[10]   An examination of the validity of the Family Affluence Scale II (FAS II) in a general adolescent population of Canada [J].
Boudreau, Brock ;
Poulin, Christiane .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2009, 94 (01) :29-42