共 50 条
Nature-based interventions for physical health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:8
作者:
Struthers, Nicole A.
[1
]
Guluzade, Nasimi A.
[2
]
Zecevic, Aleksandra A.
[1
,3
]
Walton, David M.
[1
,4
]
Gunz, Anna
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth & Rehabil Sci, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Kinesiol, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Studies, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Phys Therapy, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[5] Childrens Hlth Res Inst, 750 Base Line Rd East, London, ON N6C 2R5, Canada
[6] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
关键词:
Nature -based interventions;
Chronic health conditions;
Nature;
Health;
Systematic review;
Meta;
-analysis;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
BLOOD-PRESSURE;
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE;
FOREST THERAPY;
MENTAL-HEALTH;
HEART-RATE;
OUTDOOR;
EXPOSURE;
BENEFITS;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1016/j.envres.2024.119421
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Nature -based interventions (NBIs) are activities, strategies, or programs taking place in natural settings, such as exercising in greenspaces, to improve the health and well-being of people by integrating the benefits of nature exposure with healthy behaviours. Current reviews on NBIs do not report the effects on different groups of physical health conditions. The purpose of this systematic review and meta -analysis was to identify and synthesize the evidence of the effect of NBIs on physical health outcomes and biomarkers of physical health conditions. Overall, 20,201 studies were identified through searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and CENTRAL databases up to June 7, 2024. Inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized controlled intervention studies; 2) population with a physical health condition; 3) NBIs vs. different intervention or no intervention; and 4) measuring physical health outcomes and/or biomarkers. Twenty-six studies were included in the review, 15 of which contributed to the meta -analysis. Compared to control groups, NBIs groups showed significant improvements in: diastolic blood pressure (MD -3.73 mmHg [-7.46 to -0.00], I2 = 62%) and heart rate (MD -7.44 bpm [-14.81 to -0.06], I2 = 0%) for cardiovascular conditions, fatigue (SMD -0.50 [-0.82 to -0.18], I2 = 16%) for central nervous system conditions, and body fat percentage (MD -3.61% [-5.05 to -2.17], I2 = 0%) for endocrine conditions. High effect heterogeneity was found in several analyses and the included studies had moderate -tohigh risk of bias (RoB). The non-significant outcomes showed a direction of effect in favour of NBI groups for cardiovascular, central nervous system, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and respiratory conditions. This review found some beneficial effects in favour of NBIs for health outcomes in at least three condition groups though RoB and inconsistent effects limited some interpretations. NBIs are promising therapies that healthcare professionals can consider integrating into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条