Experiences of Self-Sampling and Future Screening Preferences in Non-Attenders Who Returned an HPV Vaginal Self-Sample in the YouScreen Study: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Questionnaire

被引:4
作者
Drysdale, Hannah [1 ]
Marlow, Laura A. V. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Anita [1 ]
Waller, Jo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Canc & Pharmaceut Sci, Fac Life Sci & Med, Canc Prevent Grp, London, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Fac Med & Dent, Ctr Canc Prevent Screening & Early Diag, London, England
关键词
cervical screening; confidence; HPV vaginal self-sampling; screening non-attenders; screening preferences; trust; WHITE BRITISH WOMEN; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; ACCEPTABILITY; BARRIERS; PARTICIPATION; ATTENDANCE; PAKISTANI; ATTITUDES; CONTEXT; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/hex.14118
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWe assessed experiences of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaginal self-sampling and future screening preferences in an ethnically and socio-economically diverse group of women overdue for cervical screening.Setting and ParticipantsA postal questionnaire was embedded in the YouScreen self-sampling trial in England: 32.5% (2712/8338) of kit completers returned the survey. Kit non-completers were encouraged to return a questionnaire, but no responses were received. Participants were ethnically diverse (40.3% came from ethnic minority backgrounds), and 59.1% came from the two most deprived quintiles. Differences in confidence in kit completion, trust in the test results and intention to attend a follow-up test if HPV-positive were evaluated using Pearson's chi 2 analyses. Binary logistic regression models explored predictors of a future screening choice and preferences for urine versus vaginal self-sampling.ResultsMost kit-completers reported high confidence in self-sampling (82.6%) and high trust in the results (79.9%), but experiences varied by ethnicity and screening status. Most free-text comments were positive but some reported difficulties using the device, pain or discomfort. Most women would opt for self-sampling in the future (71.3% vs. 10.4% for a clinician-taken test) and it was more often preferred by ethnic minority groups, overdue screeners and never attenders. Urine self-tests were preferred to vaginal tests (41.9% vs. 15.4%), especially among women from Asian, Black or Other Ethnic backgrounds.ConclusionsKit-completers were confident, found the test easy to complete, and trusted the self-sample results. However, experiences varied by ethnic group and some women highlighted difficulties with the kit. Most women would prefer self-sampling in the future, but it was not a universal preference, so offering a choice will be important.Patient or Public ContributionWe did not have direct patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in the questionnaire design. However, patients and public representatives did input into the design of the YouScreen trial and reviewed the wider study materials (e.g. participant information sheet).Trial RegistrationThis questionnaire study was embedded in the YouScreen trial. The protocol for the YouScreen trial is available at . The National Institute for Health Research 43 Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS) ID is 4441934.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Cervical screening: Perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden [J].
Abdullahi, A. ;
Copping, J. ;
Kessel, A. ;
Luck, M. ;
Bonell, C. .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 123 (10) :680-685
[2]   Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Smith, Sara B. ;
Temin, Sarah ;
Sultana, Farhana ;
Castle, Philip .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
[3]  
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, 2024, Self-collection for the cervical screening test Internet
[4]   Barriers to cervical screening and interest in self-sampling among women who actively decline screening [J].
Bennett, Kirsty F. ;
Waller, Jo ;
Chorley, Amanda J. ;
Ferrer, Rebecca A. ;
Haddrell, Jessica B. ;
Marlow, Laura A., V .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2018, 25 (04) :211-217
[5]   Comparative performance of novel self-sampling methods in detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in 30,130 women not attending cervical screening [J].
Bosgraaf, Remko P. ;
Verhoef, Viola M. J. ;
Massuger, Leon F. A. G. ;
Siebers, Albert G. ;
Bulten, Johan ;
de Kuyper-de Ridder, Gabrielle M. ;
Meijer, Chris J. M. ;
Snijders, Peter J. F. ;
Heideman, Danielle A. M. ;
IntHout, Joanna ;
van Kemenade, Folkert J. ;
Melchers, Willem J. G. ;
Bekkers, Ruud L. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (03) :646-655
[6]   Beyond COVID-19-will self-sampling and testing become the norm? [J].
Boum, Yap ;
Eyangoh, Sara ;
Okomo, Marie-Claire .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (09) :1194-1195
[7]   A Randomized Comparison of Different Vaginal Self-sampling Devices and Urine for Human Papillomavirus Testing-Predictors 5.1 [J].
Cadman, Louise ;
Reuter, Caroline ;
Jitlal, Mark ;
Kleeman, Michelle ;
Austin, Janet ;
Hollingworth, Tony ;
Parberry, Anna L. ;
Ashdown-Barr, Lesley ;
Patel, Deepali ;
Nedjai, Belinda ;
Lorincz, Attila T. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (04) :661-668
[8]   Comparative community outreach to increase cervical cancer screening in the Mississippi Delta [J].
Castle, Philip E. ;
Rausa, Alfio ;
Walls, Tameka ;
Gravitt, Patti E. ;
Partridge, Edward E. ;
Olivo, Vanessa ;
Niwa, Shelley ;
Morrissey, Kerry Grace ;
Tucker, Laura ;
Katki, Hormuzd ;
Scarinci, Isabel .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 52 (06) :452-455
[9]   Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis [J].
Chorley, Amanda J. ;
Marlow, Laura A. V. ;
Forster, Alice S. ;
Haddrell, Jessica B. ;
Waller, Jo .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (02) :161-172
[10]   Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening [J].
Costa, Stefanie ;
Verberckmoes, Bo ;
Castle, Philip E. E. ;
Arbyn, Marc .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 128 (05) :805-813