Ceftaroline fosamil treatment patterns and outcomes in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a real-world multinational, retrospective study

被引:2
作者
Soriano, Alex [1 ]
Bassetti, Matteo [2 ,3 ]
Gogos, Charalambos [4 ]
Ferry, Tristan [5 ]
de Pablo, Raul [6 ]
Ansari, Wajeeha [7 ]
Kantecki, Michal [8 ]
Schweikert, Bernd [9 ]
Luna, Gustavo [10 ]
Blasi, Francesco [11 ,12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Infect Dis Dept, CIBERINF, CIBER Infect Dis, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Osped Policlin IRCCS San Martino, Infect Dis, Clin Malattie Infett, Genoa, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Genoa, Italy
[4] Univ Patras, Dept Internal Med, Divison Infect Dis, Patras, Greece
[5] Hosp Civils Lyon, Croix Rousse Hosp, Infect Dis Dept, Lyon, France
[6] Univ Alcala, Hosp Univ Ramon & Cajal, Dept Intens Care, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
[7] Pfizer, Pfizer Biopharmaceut Grp, New York, NY 10001 USA
[8] Pfizer, Global Med Affaris, Paris, France
[9] ICON Plc, Hlth Econ & Epidemiol, Munich, Germany
[10] ICON Plc, Hlth Econ & Epidemiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[11] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin Milan, Resp Unit, Milan, Italy
[12] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin Milan, Cyst Fibrosis Ctr, Milan, Italy
[13] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
来源
JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE | 2024年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
INFECTIOUS-DISEASES-SOCIETY; RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; THORACIC-SOCIETY; NON-INFERIORITY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CEFTRIAXONE; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1093/jacamr/dlae078
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: This multicentre, observational, retrospective chart review study assessed ceftaroline fosamil treatment patterns and outcomes in adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in usual care settings. Methods: Anonymized patient data were extracted from hospital records of adults with CAP who received >= 4 consecutive IV ceftaroline fosamil doses at sites in Brazil, Colombia, France, Greece, Italy, Russia and Spain. Results: The dataset included 185 patients (58.9% male; mean age 62.2 years), of whom 128 (69.2%) had severe CAP defined by CURB-65, PSI/PORT score or physician judgement. Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 44; 23.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA (n = 15) and MRSA (n = 14)] were the most frequently identified pathogens. Clinical response occurred in 151 (81.6%) patients overall, and in 104 (81.3%) severe CAP patients. Response within <= 4 and >4 days occurred in 79 (42.7%) and 62 (33.5%) patients (unknown, n = 10), respectively. Twenty (10.8%) patients required readmission within 30 days. Thirty-day all-cause mortality rates were 9.7% (n = 18) overall and 10.2% (n = 13) in severe CAP. In sensitivity analysis using ICU admission as a more objective marker of severe CAP (n = 75), clinical response and 30 day mortality occurred in 57 (76.0%) and 10 (13.3%) patients, respectively. Overall, clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil was associated with >60% shorter length of ICU stay (3.6 versus 9.2 days), and >30% lower hospital costs ($8449 versus $12 559) versus non-responders. Conclusions: Ceftaroline fosamil was effective in treating adults with CAP, including severe CAP, in Europe and Latin America. Clinical response to ceftaroline fosamil was associated with reductions in healthcare resource use compared with non-responders.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Allergan, 2021, TEFLARO TRADE CEFTAR
[2]   Understanding the burden of pneumococcal disease in adults [J].
Blasi, F. ;
Mantero, M. ;
Santus, PierAchille ;
Tarsia, P. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 :7-14
[3]   Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: from FOCUS to CAPTURE [J].
Carreno J.J. ;
Lodise T.P. .
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2014, 3 (2) :123-132
[4]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Latin America:: results from five years of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program [J].
Castanheira, M ;
Gales, AC ;
Mendes, RE ;
Jones, RN ;
Sader, HS .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (07) :645-651
[5]  
Cilloniz C., 2018, Antimicrobial resistance in the 21st century, P13, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78538-72
[6]   CANVAS 1: the first Phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections [J].
Corey, G. Ralph ;
Wilcox, Mark H. ;
Talbot, George H. ;
Thye, Dirk ;
Friedland, David ;
Baculik, Tanya .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 65 :iv41-iv51
[7]   A Retrospective Analysis of Probability of Target Attainment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Comparators [J].
Cristinacce, Andrew ;
Wright, James G. ;
Stone, Gregory G. ;
Hammond, Jennifer ;
McFadyen, Lynn ;
Raber, Susan .
INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) :185-198
[8]   A Phase III, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infection with systemic inflammatory response or underlying comorbidities [J].
Dryden, Matthew ;
Zhang, Yingyuan ;
Wilson, David ;
Iaconis, Joseph P. ;
Gonzalez, Jesus .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (12) :3575-3584
[9]  
Ewig S, 2001, COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA, P475
[10]   FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia [J].
File, Thomas M., Jr. ;
Low, Donald E. ;
Eckburg, Paul B. ;
Talbot, George H. ;
Friedland, H. David ;
Lee, Jon ;
Llorens, Lily ;
Critchley, Ian A. ;
Thye, Dirk A. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 :III19-III32