Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

被引:0
作者
Kazemian, Soheil [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [1 ]
Iranmanesh, Mohammad [2 ]
Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup Campus, Joondalup, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Malaysia
关键词
Carbon footprint calculation; Agriculture; Forestry and fishing industry; Australia; Input-output; Lifecycle assessment; IELab; WASTE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; MITIGATION; LIVESTOCK; PRODUCTS; ENERGY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0610
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study examines the carbon emissions of Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.FindingsIn 2018, the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia's carbon footprint. Major contributors included the "electricity, gas, water, and waste" category (26.1%) and the sector's activities (24.3%). The "transport, postal, and warehousing" sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.Research limitations/implicationsThe principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.Social implicationsThe study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia's carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.Originality/valueThis study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carbon footprint analysis in the aquaculture industry: Assessment of an ecological shrimp farm
    Chang, Ching-Chih
    Chang, Kuei-Chao
    Lin, Wen-Chun
    Wu, Ming-Hsi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 1101 - 1107
  • [42] Carbon prices and greenhouse gases abatement from agriculture, forestry and land use in Nepal
    Pradhan, Bijay B.
    Shrestha, Ram M.
    Hoa, Nguyen T.
    Matsuoka, Yuzuru
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 43 : 26 - 36
  • [43] Mixed messages: Buying back Australia's fishing industry
    Minnegal, Monica
    Dwyer, Peter D.
    MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (06) : 1063 - 1071
  • [44] The modelling approach determines the carbon footprint of biofuels: The role of LCA in informing decision makers in government and industry
    Brandao, Miguel
    Azzi, Elias
    Novaes, Renan M. L.
    Cowie, Annette
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 2
  • [45] Carbon Footprint and Embodied Energy for Sugar Production: A case Study of Sugar Industry, Tamil Nadu, India
    Arangasamy, Divya Bharathy
    Subramaniam, Maragatham
    Rangasamy, Santhi
    Veeraswamy, Davamani
    Dananjeyan, Balachandar
    Desikan, Ramesh
    SUGAR TECH, 2024, 26 (04) : 1096 - 1107
  • [46] Comparative analysis of carbon footprint between conventional smallholder operation and innovative largescale farming of urban agriculture in Beijing, China
    Hu, Yingjie
    Sun, Jin
    Zheng, Ji
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [47] Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed
    Kinley, Robert D.
    Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
    Matthews, Melissa K.
    de Nys, Rocky
    Magnusson, Marie
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [48] Developing a framework for carbon footprint assessment for Indian agriculture scenario
    Sruthi, K., V
    Samuel, Manoj P.
    Naveena, K.
    Surendran, U.
    Onte, Santosh
    Sarathjith, M. C.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2024, 127 (07): : 789 - 794
  • [49] Assessing the carbon footprint of the data transmission on a backbone network
    Ficher, Marion
    Berthoud, Francoise
    Ligozat, Anne-Laure
    Sigonneau, Patrick
    Wissle, Maxime
    Tebbani, Badis
    2021 24TH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN CLOUDS, INTERNET AND NETWORKS AND WORKSHOPS (ICIN), 2021,
  • [50] Carbon footprint of the generation of bioelectricity from sugarcane bagasse in a sugar and ethanol industry
    Carvalho, Monica
    da Silva Segundo, Valdir Bernardino
    de Medeiros, Mariane Gama
    dos Santos, Nataly Albuquerque
    Coelho Junior, Luiz Moreira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2019, 17 (03) : 235 - 251