Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Kazemian, Soheil [1 ]
Zaman, Rashid [1 ]
Iranmanesh, Mohammad [2 ]
Sanusi, Zuraidah Mohd [3 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup Campus, Joondalup, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Bundoora Campus, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Accounting Res Inst, Shah Alam, Malaysia
关键词
Carbon footprint calculation; Agriculture; Forestry and fishing industry; Australia; Input-output; Lifecycle assessment; IELab; WASTE MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; MITIGATION; LIVESTOCK; PRODUCTS; ENERGY; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0610
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study examines the carbon emissions of Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.FindingsIn 2018, the "agriculture, forestry, and fishing" sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia's carbon footprint. Major contributors included the "electricity, gas, water, and waste" category (26.1%) and the sector's activities (24.3%). The "transport, postal, and warehousing" sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.Research limitations/implicationsThe principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia's agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.Social implicationsThe study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia's carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.Originality/valueThis study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon footprint scenarios for renewable electricity in Australia
    Wolfram, Paul
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    Diesendorf, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 124 : 236 - 245
  • [2] Energy Flows and Carbon Footprint in the Forestry-Pulp and Paper Industry
    Zhao, Qingjian
    Ding, Sheng
    Wen, Zuomin
    Toppinen, Anne
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (09):
  • [3] Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine: A Systematic Review
    van der Zee, Casper
    Chang-Wolf, Jennifer
    Koopmanschap, Marc A.
    van Leeuwen, Redmer
    Wisse, Robert P. L.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2024, 17
  • [4] Role of foreign direct investments in agriculture, forestry and fishing in developing countries
    Nyiwul, Linus
    Koirala, Niraj P.
    FUTURE BUSINESS JOURNAL, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [5] CARBON FOOTPRINT AND THE DAIRY INDUSTRY
    Chase, L. E.
    2014 CORNELL NUTRITION CONFERENCE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS, PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 148 - 154
  • [6] AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING SECTOR PROFITABILITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
    Bogicevic, Jasmina
    Domanovic, Violeta
    Obradovic, Vladimir
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2020, 29 (11): : 9730 - 9740
  • [7] Agriculture-specific determinants of carbon footprint
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 121 (03): : 166 - 170
  • [8] Comparison of carbon footprint and water scarcity footprint of milk protein produced by cellular agriculture and the dairy industry
    Katri Behm
    Marja Nappa
    Nina Aro
    Alan Welman
    Stewart Ledgard
    Marjut Suomalainen
    Jeremy Hill
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 1017 - 1034
  • [9] Comparison of carbon footprint and water scarcity footprint of milk protein produced by cellular agriculture and the dairy industry
    Behm, Katri
    Nappa, Marja
    Aro, Nina
    Welman, Alan
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Suomalainen, Marjut
    Hill, Jeremy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (08) : 1017 - 1034
  • [10] Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview
    Lombardi, Mariarosaria
    Laiola, Elisabetta
    Tricase, Caterina
    Rana, Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 66 : 43 - 52