COR Themes for Readability from Iterative Feedback

被引:0
作者
Cai, Tianyuan [1 ]
Niklaus, Aleena Gertrudes [2 ]
Kerr, Bernard [2 ]
Kraley, Michael [2 ]
Bylinskii, Zoya [3 ]
机构
[1] Adobe Res, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] Adobe Inc, San Jose, CA USA
[3] Adobe Res, Cambridge, MA USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS, CHI 2024 | 2024年
关键词
human-in-the-loop; reading; presets; crowdsourcing; readability; ACCURACY TRADE-OFF; READING-COMPREHENSION; TEXT READABILITY; DYSLEXIA; FONT; CHILDREN; PEOPLE; LEGIBILITY; TYPOGRAPHY; TYPEFACES;
D O I
10.1145/3613904.3642108
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Digital reading applications give readers the ability to customize fonts, sizes, and spacings, all of which have been shown to improve the reading experience for readers from different demographics. However, tweaking these text features can be challenging, especially given their interactions on the final look and feel of the text. Our solution is to offer readers preset combinations of font, character, word and line spacing, which we bundle together into reading themes. We identify a recommended set of reading themes through data-driven design iterations with the crowd and experts. We show that after four design iterations, we converge on a set of three COR themes (Compact, Open, and Relaxed) that meet diverse readers' preferences, when evaluating the reading speeds, comprehension scores, and preferences of hundreds of readers with and without dyslexia, using crowdsourced experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Busy CEO and financial statement footnotes readability: evidence from Indonesia
    Harymawan, Iman
    Ratri, Melinda Cahyaning
    Ayuningtyas, Eka Sari
    ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2024, 32 (04) : 573 - 605
  • [22] Listen to Others, Listen to Yourself: Combining Feedback Review and Reflection to Improve Iterative Design
    Yen, Yu-Chun Grace
    Dow, Steven P.
    Gerber, Elizabeth
    Bailey, Brian P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON CREATIVITY AND COGNITION (C&C 2017), 2017, : 158 - 170
  • [23] Usability of a Personal Air Pollution Monitor: Design-Feedback Iterative Cycle Study
    Duncan, Glen E.
    Seto, Edmund
    Avery, Ally R.
    Oie, Mike
    Carvlin, Graeme
    Austin, Elena
    Shirai, Jeffry H.
    He, Jiayang
    Ockerman, Byron
    Novosselov, Igor
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (12):
  • [24] Predicting Reading and Mathematics From Neural Activity for Feedback Learning
    Peters, Sabine
    Van der Meulen, Mara
    Zanolie, Kiki
    Crone, Eveline A.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 53 (01) : 149 - 159
  • [25] Does prospectus readability matter for bond issuance pricing? Evidence from China
    Li, Fengyu
    Yang, Mozhu
    Zhang, Tong
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 80
  • [26] Readability of Online Information Related to Pediatric Radiation Safety From Societal Websites
    Yi, Paul H.
    Yi, Meghan M.
    Nguyen, Jie C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (05) : 1128 - 1134
  • [27] Assessment of the Readability of Online Patient Education Material from Major Geriatric Associations
    van Ballegooie, Courtney
    Hoang, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (04) : 1051 - 1056
  • [28] The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses
    Ante, Lennart
    JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [29] A quantitative readability analysis of patient education resources from gastroenterology society websites
    David R. Hansberry
    Sahil R. Patel
    Prateek Agarwal
    Nitin Agarwal
    Elizabeth S. John
    Ann M. John
    James C. Reynolds
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 917 - 920
  • [30] A quantitative readability analysis of patient education resources from gastroenterology society websites
    Hansberry, David R.
    Patel, Sahil R.
    Agarwal, Prateek
    Agarwal, Nitin
    John, Elizabeth S.
    John, Ann M.
    Reynolds, James C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (06) : 917 - 920