OHIP-5 FOR SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN

被引:4
作者
Solanke, Cia [1 ]
John, Mike T. [2 ]
Ebel, Markus
Altner, Sarra [1 ,3 ]
Bekes, Katrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Univ Clin Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sensengasse 2a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Dent, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth,Dept Diagnost & Bi, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Gen Special Care & Geriatr Dent, Zurich, Switzerland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Oral health-related quality of life; Dental patient-reported outcomes; Oral Health Impact Profile; Pediatric patients; Psychometric properties; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ORAL-HEALTH; SHORT FORMS; SCALE; VALIDATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101947
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above. Aim It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5(School)) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity. Methods German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5(School). It's score reliability was studied by determining scores' internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5(School) scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G(8-10)) scores. Results Score reliability for the OHIP-5(School) was "good"(Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or "excellent"(Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP5(School), OHIP-5, and CPQ-G(8-10) scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity. Conclusion The OHIP-5(School) and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Oral health surveys: basic methods, V5th
  • [2] Feasibility of oral health-related quality of life assessment in prosthodontic patients using abbreviated Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaires
    Baba, K.
    Inukai, M.
    John, M. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 35 (03) : 224 - 228
  • [3] The German version of Child Perceptions Questionnaire for children aged 8 to 10 years (CPQ-G8-10): translation, reliability, and validity
    Bekes, Katrin
    Ebel, Markus
    Omara, Maisa
    Boukhobza, Sarra
    Dumitrescu, Nicoletta
    Priller, Julia
    Redzic, Nejra Kulovic
    Nidetzky, Anuscha
    Stamm, Tanja
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (03) : 1433 - 1439
  • [4] Why poor children are more likely to become poor readers: the early years
    Buckingham, Jennifer
    Beaman, Robyn
    Wheldall, Kevin
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 2014, 66 (04) : 428 - 446
  • [5] DENTAL THERAPY AND DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (DPROS)
    Chanthavisouk, Phonsuda
    Pattanaik, Swaha
    Warren, Cheyanne E.
    Brickle, Colleen
    Self, Karl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development
    Clark, LA
    Watson, D
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) : 309 - 319
  • [7] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.43249780203771587
  • [8] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [9] THE VOICE OF THE PATIENT IN OROFACIAL PAIN MANAGEMENT
    Haggman-Henrikson, Birgitta
    Lobbezoo, Frank
    Durham, Justin
    Peck, Christopher
    List, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] THE USE OF DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AMONG COMPARATIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES IN ORTHODONTICS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY
    Huang, Xinliang
    Tao, Zhendong
    Ngan, Peter
    Qin, Danchen
    He, Hong
    Hua, Fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (01)