Partisanship, Race, and Public Opinion on Redistricting: The Case of South Carolina

被引:0
|
作者
Cooper, Christopher A. [1 ]
Huffmon, Scott H. [2 ]
Knotts, H. Gibbs [3 ]
McKee, Seth C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Carolina Univ, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
[2] Winthrop Univ, Rock Hill, NC USA
[3] Coll Charleston, Charleston, SC USA
[4] Oklahoma State Univ, Oklahoma City, OK USA
来源
ELECTION LAW JOURNAL | 2024年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
redistricting public opinion; minority group voting rights; partisanship; CONSEQUENCES; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1089/elj.2023.0048
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Despite a growing national conversation about redistricting reform and an increasing number of political hobbyists making redistricting one of the most debated topics in American politics, we know surprisingly little about what citizens think about redistricting. Using original survey data on over 1,300 South Carolinians, we discover that many respondents remain agnostic or uninformed about the redistricting process. Across six models, partisanship is a key driver of South Carolinians' opinions on redistricting, with Republicans expressing more support for the current process than Democrats in this deep red state. We also discover that Black South Carolinians have distinct and generally more circumspect impressions of the redistricting process, particularly regarding descriptive representation. These findings will interest academics and practitioners who work in the areas of election science, public opinion, election law, and redistricting, and can inform our knowledge of how the public might respond to the United States Supreme Court decision in Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 344
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Party Over Principles: Determinants of Public Opinion on Redistricting Reform
    Mclaughlin, Peter T.
    STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2025,
  • [2] Ends Versus Means: Public Opinion on Congressional Redistricting
    McLaughlin, Peter T.
    Olson, Peter
    Barron, Nathan T.
    Ashton III, H. Benjamin
    Blum, Rachel
    Finocchiaro, Charles J.
    Crespin, Michael H.
    ELECTION LAW JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [3] Rooted in Racism? Race, Partisanship, Status Threat, and Public Opinion Toward Statehood for Washington, DC
    Nteta, Tatishe M. M.
    Rhodes, Jesse H. H.
    Wall, Gregory
    Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L. L.
    La Raja, Raymond J. J.
    Lickel, Brian
    Mah, Andrea
    MacWilliams, Matthew
    Markowitz, Ezra M. M.
    Reid, Allecia
    Theodoridis, Alexander
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 76 (03) : 1486 - 1501
  • [4] Partisanship does not tell the full story: The complexities of public opinion and fracking in the United States
    Lee, Michelle H. W.
    Clark, Ashley
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 70
  • [5] Partisanship, motivated reasoning and the notwithstanding Clause: the case of provincially imposed redistricting in the city of Toronto
    McGregor, R. Michael
    Anderson, Cameron
    Pruysers, Scott
    COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2021, 59 (01) : 94 - 117
  • [6] Partisanship and public opinion on cash transfers: survey evidence from Kenya
    Ochieng' Opalo, Ken
    COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2021, 59 (03) : 240 - 274
  • [7] Price and party: The importance of partisanship and cost in American climate public opinion
    Scheuch, Eric G.
    PLOS CLIMATE, 2024, 3 (05):
  • [8] Public opinion, political partisanship and the Votes-at-16 debate in the United Kingdom
    Loughran, Thomas
    Mycock, Andrew
    Tonge, Jonathan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2022, 24 (02) : 297 - 323
  • [9] The Politics of Locating Polling Places: Race and Partisanship in North Carolina Election Administration, 2008-2016
    Shepherd, Michael E.
    Fresh, Adriane
    Eubank, Nick
    Clinton, Joshua D.
    ELECTION LAW JOURNAL, 2021, 20 (02): : 155 - 177
  • [10] Why Reparations? Race and Public Opinion Toward Reparations
    Rhodes, Jesse H.
    Nteta, Tatishe M.
    Hopkins, Lilliauna
    Wall, Gregory
    RSF-THE RUSSELL SAGE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 10 (03): : 30 - 48