Enhancing Robustness in Precast Modular Frame Optimization: Integrating NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and RVEA for Sustainable Infrastructure

被引:6
作者
Ruiz-Velez, Andres [1 ]
Garcia, Jose [2 ]
Alcala, Julian [1 ]
Yepes, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Concrete Sci & Technol ICITECH, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Sch Construct & Transportat Engn, Valparaiso 2362804, Chile
关键词
multi-objective optimization; multi-criteria decision-making; NSGA-II; NSGA-III; RVEA; SAW; FUCA; TOPSIS; PROMETHEE; VIKOR;
D O I
10.3390/math12101478
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The advancement toward sustainable infrastructure presents complex multi-objective optimization (MOO) challenges. This paper expands the current understanding of design frameworks that balance cost, environmental impacts, social factors, and structural integrity. Integrating MOO with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), the study targets enhancements in life cycle sustainability for complex engineering projects using precast modular road frames. Three advanced evolutionary algorithms-NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and RVEA-are optimized and deployed to address sustainability objectives under performance constraints. The efficacy of these algorithms is gauged through a comparative analysis, and a robust MCDM approach is applied to nine non-dominated solutions, employing SAW, FUCA, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and VIKOR decision-making techniques. An entropy theory-based method ensures systematic, unbiased criteria weighting, augmenting the framework's capacity to pinpoint designs balancing life cycle sustainability. The results reveal that NSGA-III is the algorithm converging towards the most cost-effective solutions, surpassing NSGA-II and RVEA by 21.11% and 10.07%, respectively, while maintaining balanced environmental and social impacts. The RVEA achieves up to 15.94% greater environmental efficiency than its counterparts. The analysis of non-dominated solutions identifies the A4 design, utilizing 35 MPa concrete and B500S steel, as the most sustainable alternative across 80% of decision-making algorithms. The ranking correlation coefficients above 0.94 demonstrate consistency among decision-making techniques, underscoring the robustness of the integrated MOO and MCDM framework. The results in this paper expand the understanding of the applicability of novel techniques for enhancing engineering practices and advocate for a comprehensive strategy that employs advanced MOO algorithms and MCDM to enhance sustainable infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Description of Methodology to Map Social Impact Information from PSILCA v3 to Ecoinvent v. 3.7.1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire
[4]  
BEDEC Catalonia Institute of Construction Technology, BEDEC ITEC Materials Database
[5]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215
[6]  
Blank Julian, 2019, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. 10th International Conference, EMO 2019. Proceedings: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 11411), P229, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12598-1_19
[7]   Pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python']Python [J].
Blank, Julian ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :89497-89509
[8]  
Brundtland G. H., 1987, Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development
[9]  
CEN, 2013, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures
[10]   A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Cheng, Ran ;
Jin, Yaochu ;
Olhofer, Markus ;
Sendhoff, Bernhard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (05) :773-791