Researcher-Practitioner Collaboration in Action Design Research

被引:0
作者
Cronholm, Stefan [1 ]
Gobel, Hannes [1 ]
Shrestha, Anup [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Business, Toowoomba, Australia
关键词
researcher-practitioner collaboration; action design research; ADR projects; design science research; academy-industry collaboration; SCIENCE RESEARCH; GROUNDED THEORY; DOMINANT LOGIC; INFORMATION; FIELD;
D O I
10.3127/ajis.v28.4281
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Action Design Research (ADR) is a well-known research method within Design Science Research (DSR). An essential characteristic of the ADR method is the need for researcher- practitioner collaboration (RPC). While there is abundant research on RPC regarding information systems projects in general concerning explanatory and normative knowledge, there is very limited prescriptive knowledge on how to execute RPC in ADR projects. Successful collaboration in ADR projects is imperative since the development of sociotechnical IT artefacts requires frequent interaction in organisational contexts. However, RPC can be hard to manage due to competing interests. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present prescriptive knowledge for how to manage RPC. We have analysed a collaborative ADR project consisting of several researchers and practitioners. Based on a grounded theory approach, we have developed theoretical models based on challenges identified in an ADR project. The models provide prescriptive knowledge regarding: shape the IT artefact based on organisational intervention, exploit the mutual dependency between developing design principles and IT artefacts, and contextualise and generalise learning. Each model involves logical relationships between: conditions for the challenges, actions taken to address the challenges and consequences of the actions taken. The guidelines were deducted from the models and consist of recommendations that could be considered in future ADR projects.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Choosing Action Design Research for the Process of Development, Application and Evaluation of a Framework
    Wing, Jeanette
    Andrew, Theo
    Petkov, Doncho
    2017 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING APPLICATIONS (NEXTCOMP), 2017, : 135 - 140
  • [32] Design principles for artificial intelligence-augmented decision making: An action design research study
    Herath Pathirannehelage, Savindu
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    von Krogh, Georg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, 34 (02) : 207 - 229
  • [33] Open KMU: Mit Action Design Research und Design Thinking gemeinsam innovierenOpen SMEs: Collaborative Innovation with Action Design Research and Design Thinking
    Felix Becker
    Michael Meyer
    Beke Redlich
    Dominik Siemon
    Christoph Lattemann
    HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2020, 57 (2) : 274 - 284
  • [34] An elaborated action design research process model
    Mullarkey, Matthew T.
    Hevner, Alan R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 28 (01) : 6 - 20
  • [35] Configuration information system architecture: Insights from applied action design research
    Gill, Asif Qumer
    Chew, Eng
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (04) : 507 - 525
  • [36] A Distinctive Analysis of Case Study, Action Research and Design Science Research
    Dresch, Aline
    Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco
    Cauchick Miguel, Paulo Augusto
    RBGN-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO DE NEGOCIOS, 2015, 17 (56): : 1116 - 1133
  • [37] Design Science Research Engagement: Proposal for an Engagement Approach for Company Collaboration
    Sommer, Anita Frus
    Moller, Charles
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 6105 : 530 - 533
  • [38] Process Mining of Knowledge-Intensive Processes: An Action Design Research Study in Manufacturing
    Loehr, Bernd
    Brennig, Katharina
    Bartelheimer, Christian
    Beverungen, Daniel
    Mueller, Oliver
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2022), 2022, 13420 : 251 - 267
  • [39] An Action Design Research Approach within Enterprise Engineering
    Marné de Vries
    Simone Berger
    Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2017, 30 : 187 - 207
  • [40] An Action Design Research Approach within Enterprise Engineering
    de Vries, Marne
    Berger, Simone
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2017, 30 (02) : 187 - 207