Papaverine prior to catheter balloon insertion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

被引:1
作者
Abu Shqara, Raneen [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Yara Nakhleh [1 ,2 ]
Goldinfeld, Gabriela [2 ]
Haddad, Yousef [1 ,2 ]
Sgayer, Inshirah [1 ,2 ]
Lavinsky, Miri [1 ]
Lowenstein, Lior [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Maya Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Galilee Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nahariyya, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
关键词
Bishop scores; catheter balloon; labor induction -to -deliv- interval; labor induction; papaverine; visual analog scale; FOLEY CATHETER; DROTAVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE; MISOPROSTOL; OUTCOMES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101388
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Catheter balloon insertion is a common method for cervical ripening and labor induction. Papaverine and its derivatives are musculotropic antispasmodic drugs that directly induce smooth muscle relaxation. Used during childbirth, these drugs have been suggested to shorten the duration of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of administering papaverine before catheter balloon insertion on changes in Bishop scores and on the labor induction -to -delivery interval. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a single tertiary university-aff iliated hospital. Participants were admitted at term for labor induction with an initial Bishop score of <= 6. Participants were randomized to receive 80 mg intravenous papaverine or 0.9% normal saline solution within 30 minutes of Foley catheter balloon insertion. The co-primary outcomes were the difference in Bishop score from before catheter balloon insertion to after removal and the labor induction -to -delivery interval. The secondary outcomes included maternal pain and satisfaction scores, delivery within 24 hours, and neonatal outcomes. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 110 women were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median difference in Bishop score was greater in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (5 [interquartile range, 1-11] vs 4 [interquartile range, 0-7], respectively; P=.025), and the median catheter balloon insertion -to -delivery interval was shorter in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (21 hours [interquartile range, 6 -95] vs 26 hours [interquartile range, 3 -108], respectively; P=.031). A higher proportion of women delivered within 24-hours in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (65.5% vs 41.8%, respectively; P=.012). Pain and satisfaction scores, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups. Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis. CONCLUSION: Papaverine administration before Foley catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening resulted in improved Bishop scores and shorter catheter balloon insertion -to -delivery intervals.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison between intravaginal and oral misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
    Nopdonrattakoon, L
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (02) : 87 - 91
  • [32] Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: A randomized clinical trial
    Abide, Cigdem Yayla
    Eken, Meryem Kurek
    Ozkaya, Enis
    Yenidede, Ilter
    Ergen, Evrim Bostanci
    Kilicci, Cetin
    Sanverdi, Ilhan
    Eroglu, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (12) : 2149 - 2155
  • [33] Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Jaryal, Sakshi
    Soni, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [34] Induction of labor in women with previous caesarean delivery with balloon catheter: Is it worth it?
    Boujenah, J.
    Fleury, C.
    Tigaizin, A.
    Benbara, A.
    Mounsambote, L.
    Murtada, R.
    Fermaud, M.
    Carbillon, L.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2019, 47 (03): : 273 - 280
  • [35] Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety
    Lanka, Sreelakshmi
    Surapaneni, Tarakeswari
    Nirmalan, Praveen K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (06) : 1527 - 1533
  • [36] Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial
    Rab, Mohammed T. Gadel
    Mohammed, Abdel Baset F.
    Zahran, Khalid A.
    Hassan, Mo'men M.
    Eldeen, Abdel Razek M.
    Ebrahim, Emad M.
    Yehia, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (10) : 1181 - 1185
  • [37] Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial
    Soni, Anjali
    Sharma, Aarti
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Verma, Suresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [38] Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Levine, Lisa D.
    Downes, Katheryne L.
    Elovitz, Michal A.
    Parry, Samuel
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (06) : 1357 - 1364
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol versus transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS)
    Alkmark, Marten
    Carlsson, Ylva
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    Elden, Helen
    Fadl, Helena
    Jonsson, Maria
    Ladfors, Lars
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Wessberg, Anna
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Hagberg, Henrik
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (08) : 1463 - 1477
  • [40] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques
    Barrilleaux, PS
    Bofill, JA
    Terrone, DA
    Magann, EF
    May, WL
    Morrison, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1124 - 1129