Bridging information gaps: A rapid assessment of cetacean watching tourism in Sri Lanka

被引:0
作者
Sumanapala, Daminda [1 ]
Wolf, Isabelle D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Arts Business Law & Social Sci, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Geog & Sustainable Communities, Australian Ctr Culture Environm Soc & Space, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT | 2024年 / 47卷
关键词
Cetacean watching; Ecotourism; Developing countries; Risk; Sri Lanka; WILDLIFE TOURISM; BALAENOPTERA-MUSCULUS; BLUE-WHALES; FRAMEWORK; DPSIR; RISK; CONSERVATION; RECREATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jort.2024.100802
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cetacean watching tourism is growing in popularity worldwide. Although previous studies have reported ecological and physical impacts arising from the cetacean watching industry knowledge is still limited especially on long-term impacts. This holds particularly true for developing countries in Asia where the rapid growth of the industry is not met with similar scientific efforts to assess impacts. To address this issue Mustika et al. (2017) used the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) indicator assessment framework as a quick evaluation of the scientific, policy and management aspects of the risks associated with the cetacean watching tourism in six Asian countries. However their assessment did not include Sri Lanka because the cetacean watching industry there is mainly focused on dolphin watching, which is a gap that we fill here. Our study revealed that Sri Lanka is at a medium risk level compared with the other six Asian countries that have previously been assessed. We present the details of this assessment and caution that it is critical to monitor the development in Sri Lanka to ensure the long-term sustainability of the cetacean watching industry.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Anderson R. C., 2019, Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, V20, P13
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Australian National Guidelines for Whale and Dolphin Watching
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, European Environment Agency Technical Report, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IWC Report of the Scientific Committee
[5]  
Anver G., 2012, The Leader, Colomco5 February
[6]   Mass ecotourism, media, and wildlife experience [J].
Arnegger, Julius ;
Herz, Marc ;
Campbell, Michael .
JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 45
[7]   Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach [J].
Atkins, Jonathan P. ;
Burdon, Daryl ;
Elliott, Mike ;
Gregory, Amanda J. .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2011, 62 (02) :215-226
[8]  
Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2006, Australian state of the environment Committee
[9]  
Bandara Tharindu, 2019, Sri Lanka Journal of Aquatic Sciences, V24, P41
[10]   The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status [J].
Borja, A ;
Galparsoro, I ;
Solaun, O ;
Muxika, I ;
Tello, EM ;
Uriarte, A ;
Valencia, V .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2006, 66 (1-2) :84-96