Multi-Model Machine Learning Approach Accurately Predicts Lake Dissolved Oxygen With Multiple Environmental Inputs

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Shuqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pierson, Donald C. [2 ,3 ]
Ladwig, Robert [4 ]
Kraemer, Benjamin M. [5 ]
Hu, Fenjuan R. S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Canada Ctr Inland Waters, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Uppsala Univ, Erken Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Limnol Dept, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI USA
[5] IGB Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisherie, Berlin, Germany
[6] VIA Univ Coll, Res Ctr Bldg Energy Water & Climate, Horsens, Denmark
关键词
LONG-TERM CHANGES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CENTRAL BASIN; NORTH SHORE; HYPOXIA; PHOSPHORUS; DEPLETION; MODEL; VARIABILITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1029/2023EA003473
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
As a key water quality parameter, dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, and particularly changes in bottom water DO is fundamental for understanding the biogeochemical processes in lake ecosystems. Based on two machine learning (ML) models, Gradient Boost Regressor (GBR) and long-short-term-memory (LSTM) network, this study developed three ML model approaches: direct GBR; direct LSTM; and a 2-step mixed ML model workflow combining both GBR and LSTM. They were used to simulate multi-year surface and bottom DO concentrations in five lakes. All approaches were trained with readily available environmental data as predictors. Indices of lake thermal structure and mixing provided by a one-dimensional (1-D) hydrodynamic model were also included as predictors in the ML models. The advantages of each ML approach were not consistent for all the tested lakes, but the best one of them was defined that can estimate DO concentration with coefficient of determination (R2) up to 0.6-0.7 in each lake. All three approaches have normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) under 0.15. In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed model workflow showed better representation of bottom DO concentrations, with a highest true positive rate (TPR) of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection of over 90%, while the other workflows resulted in, TPRs are around 50%. In most of the tested lakes, the predicted surface DO concentrations and variables indicating stratified conditions (i.e., Wedderburn number and the temperature difference between surface and bottom water) are essential for simulating bottom DO. The ML approaches showed promising results and could be used to support short- and long-term water management plans. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations is the essential water quality parameter in lake systems. Nowadays, with the development of data-driven machine learning (ML) models, prediction of DO concentrations can be achieved via these models in lakes with long-term DO concentration observations. This study developed three ML model approaches with one mixed two kind of ML models, and test them in five lakes. Readily available environmental data and the derived hydrodynamic data from process-based hydrodynamic model were used as predictors. All three ML approaches showed promising results, and the mixed ML approach show better skill in the lake stratifying and mixing irregularly. To predict hypoxia in the bottom of the lake, the surface DO concentrations and variables indicating water column stratification are important. A 2-step machine learning workflow combining Gradient Boost Regressor and long-short-term-memory was applied to simulate dissolved oxygen A one-dimensional process-based hydrodynamic model provides ML models with indices of lake thermal structure and mixing In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed machine learning workflow showed over 90% true positive rate of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Harnessing Distributed Deep Learning for Landslide Displacement Prediction: A Multi-Model Collaborative Approach Amidst Data Silos
    Li, Bingchen
    Li, Changdong
    Liu, Yong
    Tan, Jie
    Feng, Pengfei
    Yao, Wenmin
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2024, 35 (05) : 1770 - 1775
  • [22] A stacked machine learning model for multi-step ahead prediction of lake surface water temperature
    Di Nunno, Fabio
    Zhu, Senlin
    Ptak, Mariusz
    Sojka, Mariusz
    Granata, Francesco
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 890
  • [23] Development of multi-model ensembles using tree-based machine learning methods to assess the future renewable energy potential: case of the East Thrace, Turkey
    Guven, Denizhan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (37) : 87314 - 87329
  • [24] A Machine-Learning-Based Model for Water Quality in Coastal Waters, Taking Dissolved Oxygen and Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay as an Example
    Yu, Xin
    Shen, Jian
    Du, Jiabi
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 56 (09)
  • [25] Multi-model approach to quantify groundwater-level prediction uncertainty using an ensemble of global climate models and multiple abstraction scenarios
    Mustafa, Syed M. Touhidul
    Hasan, M. Moudud
    Saha, Ajoy Kumar
    Rannu, Rahena Parvin
    Van Uytven, Els
    Willems, Patrick
    Huysmans, Marijke
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (05) : 2279 - 2303
  • [26] Modeling climate change impact on inflow and hydropower generation of Nangbeto dam in West Africa using multi-model CORDEX ensemble and ensemble machine learning
    Obahoundje, Salomon
    Diedhiou, Arona
    Dubus, Laurent
    Alamou, Eric Adechina
    Amoussou, Ernest
    Akpoti, Komlavi
    Ofosu, Eric Antwi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 325
  • [27] Development of an artificial neural network based multi-model ensemble to estimate the northeast monsoon rainfall over south peninsular India: an application of extreme learning machine
    Acharya, Nachiketa
    Shrivastava, Nitin Anand
    Panigrahi, B. K.
    Mohanty, U. C.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (5-6) : 1303 - 1310
  • [28] Environmental drivers of dissolved organic matter composition across central European aquatic systems: A novel correlation-based machine learning and FT-ICR MS approach
    Gad, Michel
    Khomami, Narjes Tayyebi Sabet
    Krieg, Ronald
    Schor, Jana
    Philippe, Allan
    Lechtenfeld, Oliver J.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2025, 273