DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF MODELING PRACTICE FOR CFD CALCULATIONS TO OBTAIN CURRENT LOADS ON FPSO

被引:0
作者
Koop, Arjen [1 ]
Yeon, SeongMo [2 ]
Yu, Kai [3 ]
Loubeyre, Sebastien [4 ]
Xu, Wei [5 ]
Huang, Jerry [5 ]
Vinayan, Vimal [6 ,9 ]
Agrawal, Madhusuden [7 ]
Kim, Jang [8 ]
机构
[1] MARIN, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Samsung Heavy Ind, Deajeon, South Korea
[3] Amer Bur Shipping, Houston, TX USA
[4] Bur Veritas Solut Marine & Offshore, Nantes, France
[5] ExxonMobil, Houston, TX USA
[6] MARIN USA, Houston, TX USA
[7] BP, Houston, TX USA
[8] Technip FMC, Houston, TX USA
[9] Atkins, Houston, TX USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2020, VOL 1 | 2020年
关键词
CFD; Current loads; FPSO; Modeling Practice; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Current loads are important input parameters for mooring studies. To accurately predict the motions of moored vessels these quantities should be determined with confidence in the values. Traditionally, these quantities have been determined using model tests in water basins or in wind tunnels. With recent advancements in CFD modeling, the offshore industry has started using CFD as an alternative tool to compute current loads on FPSO's. In order to help adopt CFD as a widely accepted tool, there is a need to develop confidence in CFD predictions. Therefore, a practical CFD Modeling Practice is developed within the Reproducible Offshore CFD JIP. The Modeling Practice describes the geometry modeling, computational mesh, model set-up and post-processing for these types of CFD calculations. This Modeling Practice is verified and validated by five independent verifiers against model test data, such that reproducible and accurate results can be obtained by following the Modeling Practice. This paper provides an overview of the developed Modeling Practice and the calculated CFD results from the verifiers. The CFD Modeling Practice is benchmarked against available model test results for a barge-type and a tanker-shaped FPSO. By following this Modeling Practice, the CFD predictions for CY and CMZ are within 10% from all verifiers and within 10% from the model test results. Larger differences may be obtained for CX, depending on local grid resolution and turbulence model used, but also due to larger experimental uncertainty for this quantity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ASME V&V 20-2009
[2]   Random uncertainty of statistical moments in testing: Mean [J].
Brouwer, Joris ;
Tukker, Jan ;
Klinkenberg, Yvette ;
van Rijsbergen, Martijn .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 182 :563-576
[3]   A procedure for the estimation of the numerical uncertainty of CFD calculations based on grid refinement studies [J].
Eca, L. ;
Hoekstra, M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2014, 262 :104-130
[4]  
Fathi F, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2010, VOL 6, P427
[5]  
Huang Z., 2018, OMAE2018-78711
[6]  
Huang Z.J., 2012, OMAE2012-50351
[7]  
Huang Z.J., 2010, OMAE2010-21156
[8]  
Koop A, 2011, INT C COMP METH MAR
[9]   Using CFD to determine scale effects on current loads of offshore vessels in side-by-side configuration [J].
Koop, Arjen .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 195
[10]  
Koop A, 2015, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 34TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2015, VOL 2