Comparing the psychological outcomes of donor and non-donor conceived people: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Talbot, Charlotte [1 ]
Hodson, Nathan [2 ]
Rose, Joanne [3 ,4 ]
Bewley, Susan [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[2] Warwick Med Sch, Div Mental Hlth & Wellbeing, Coventry, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Paediat & Child Hlth, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Dept Infect Dis, London, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth, London, England
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; donor conceived; psychological outcomes; LONGITUDINAL LESBIAN FAMILY; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIPS; EMOTIONAL ADJUSTMENT; SINGLE MOTHERS; FOLLOW-UP; INSEMINATION; AGE; ADOLESCENTS; IDENTITY; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17892
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundOver 70 000 donor-conceived (DC) people have been born in the UK since 1991. Little is known about their long-term psychological outcomes and no systematic review has assessed these.ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review of the psychological experiences of DC people through childhood and adulthood (Prospero: CRD42021257863).Search strategySearches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), the Excerpta Medica database (Embase), MEDLINE (R) and PsycINFO, conducted on 4 January 2024.Selection criteriaQuantitative and qualitative studies were included if: there were five or more participants; they were peer reviewed; and any DC psychological outcomes were assessed. No limits on date, language or country were applied.Data collection and analysisDouble screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed, using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoring.Main resultsFifty studies (with 4666 DC participants), mostly from high-income anglophone countries, with heterogeneity of design, populations and outcome measures, were included. Of 19 comparative studies, 14 found no difference in outcomes between DC and non-DC people, ten found better outcomes (in health, well-being, self-esteem and emotional warmth) and six found worse outcomes (increased autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, addiction issues, mental illness, disruptive behaviour and identity problems). Qualitative data revealed common themes relating to identity formation, mistrust and concerns regarding genetic heritage. The evidence regarding adulthood outcomes was very limited.ConclusionsThe research on DC individuals presents a nuanced picture, with most studies suggesting comparable or improved outcomes in terms of well-being and relationships, but with a notable minority indicating higher rates of mental health and identity struggles. Qualitative findings underscore common negative experiences, whereas the early disclosure of DC status appears beneficial for psychological well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1759
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are donor-conceived people willing to use donors themselves? Insights from individuals conceived via donor-assisted reproduction
    Siegel, D. R.
    Sheeder, J.
    Kramer, W.
    Roeca, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (09) : 2087 - 2094
  • [2] 'Is blood thicker than water?' Donor conceived offspring's subjective experiences of the donor: a systematic narrative review
    Canzi, Elena
    Accordini, Monica
    Facchin, Federica
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (05) : 797 - 807
  • [3] Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors a systematic review
    Indekeu, Astrid
    Maas, A. Janneke. B. M.
    McCormick, Emily
    Benward, Jean
    Scheib, Joanna E.
    F&S REVIEWS, 2021, 2 (02): : 93 - 119
  • [4] Psychological adjustment in adolescents conceived by assisted reproduction techniques: a systematic review
    Ilioi, Elena Cristiana
    Golombok, Susan
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2015, 21 (01) : 84 - 96
  • [5] Motivational stimuli to donate sperm among non-donor students
    Ronen, Maya
    Kedem, Alon
    Avraham, Sarit
    Youngster, Michal
    Yerushalmi, Gil
    Hourvitz, Ariel
    Gat, Itai
    BASIC AND CLINICAL ANDROLOGY, 2023, 33 (01)
  • [6] Legal age limits in accessing donor information: experiences of donor-conceived people, parents, sperm donors and counsellors
    Bolt, Sophie H.
    Maas, A. Janneke B. M.
    Indekeu, Astrid
    van Nistelrooij, Inge
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 48 (06)
  • [7] Disclosure of donor conception in the era of non-anonymity: safeguarding and promoting the interests of donor-conceived individuals?
    Zadeh, Sophie
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (11) : 2416 - 2420
  • [8] The stability of psychological adjustment among donor-conceived offspring in the US National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study from childhood to adulthood: differences by donor type
    Carone, Nicola
    Gartrell, Nanette K.
    Rothblum, Esther D.
    Koh, Audrey S.
    Bos, Henny M. W.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 115 (05) : 1302 - 1311
  • [9] Health outcomes of school-aged children conceived using donor sperm
    Amor, David J.
    Lewis, Sharon
    Kennedy, Joanne
    Habgood, Emily
    McBain, John
    McLachlan, Robert I.
    Rombauts, Luk J.
    Williams, Katrina
    Halliday, Jane
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [10] More than Humor: Memes as Bonding Icons for Belonging in Donor-Conceived People
    Newton, Giselle
    Zappavigna, Michele
    Drysdale, Kerryn
    Newman, Christy E.
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2022, 8 (01):