Bridge to Life: Current Landscape of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart-Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock

被引:2
作者
Vlachakis, Panayotis K. [1 ]
Theofilis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Leontsinis, Ioannis [1 ]
Drakopoulou, Maria [1 ]
Karakasis, Paschalis [2 ]
Oikonomou, Evangelos [3 ]
Chrysohoou, Christina [1 ]
Tsioufis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Tousoulis, Dimitris [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Hippokrat Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol 1, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hippokrat Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol 2, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Thorac Dis Gen Hosp Sotiria, Dept Cardiol 3, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
cardiogenic shock; heart failure; intra-aortic balloon pump; Impella; TandemHeart; extracorporeal membranous oxygenation; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; COUNTERPULSATION; PREDICTORS; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13144120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Acute heart failure (HF) presents a significant mortality burden, necessitating continuous therapeutic advancements. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is crucial in managing cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to acute HF, serving as a bridge to recovery or durable support. Currently, MCS options include the Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), TandemHeart (TH), Impella, and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO), each offering unique benefits and risks tailored to patient-specific factors and clinical scenarios. This review examines the clinical implications of recent advancements in temporary MCS, identifies knowledge gaps, and explores promising avenues for future research and clinical application. Understanding each device's unique attributes is crucial for their efficient implementation in various clinical scenarios, ultimately advancing towards intelligent, personalized support strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes
    Abiragi, Michael
    Singer-Englar, Tahli
    Cole, Robert M. M.
    Emerson, Dominic
    Esmailian, Fardad
    Megna, Dominick
    Moriguchi, Jaime
    Kobashigawa, Jon A. A.
    Kittleson, Michelle M. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [32] Outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure
    Lim, Hoong Sern
    Ranasinghe, Aaron
    Quinn, David
    Chue, Colin
    Mascaro, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2022, 23 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [33] Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    Akin, Sakir
    Jewbali, Lucia S.
    Miranda, Dinis dos Reis
    Brugts, Jasper J.
    Constantinescu, Alina A.
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Caliskan, Kadir
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [34] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a critical appraisal
    Masiero, Giulia
    Cardaioli, Francesco
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2022, 20 (06) : 443 - 454
  • [35] Haemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with cardiogenic shock: the current evidence of mechanical circulatory support
    Kayali, Fatima
    Agbobu, Tiffany
    Moothathamby, Thurkga
    Jubouri, Yousif F.
    Jubouri, Matti
    Abdelhaliem, Amr
    Ghattas, Samuel N. S.
    Rezk, Samuel S. S.
    Bailey, Damian M.
    Williams, Ian M.
    Awad, Wael I.
    Bashir, Mohamad
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (08) : 755 - 764
  • [36] Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock in India
    Aditi Singhvi
    Julius Punnen
    [J]. Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2023, 39 : 47 - 62
  • [37] Percutaneous Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Interventional Bridge to Recovery
    Kar, Biswajit
    Basra, Sukhdeep S.
    Shah, Nishant R.
    Loyalka, Pranav
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (14) : 1809 - 1817
  • [38] Clinical Outcomes of Advanced Heart Failure Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Treated with Temporary Circulatory Support Before Durable LVAD Implant
    Shah, Palak
    Smith, Sara
    Haft, Jonathan W.
    Desai, Shashank S.
    Burton, Nelson A.
    Romano, Matthew A.
    Aaronson, Keith D.
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Cowger, Jennifer A.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [39] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction-A Review
    Bruoha, Sharon
    Yosefy, Chaim
    Taha, Louay
    Dvir, Danny
    Shuvy, Mony
    Jubeh, Rami
    Carasso, Shemy
    Glikson, Michael
    Asher, Elad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [40] Heart rescue: the role of mechanical circulatory support in the management of severe refractory cardiogenic shock
    Sayer, Gabriel T.
    Baker, Joshua N.
    Parks, Kimberly A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 18 (05) : 409 - 416