Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Beckmann, M.
    Gibbons, K.
    Flenady, V
    Kumar, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (05) : 571 - 579
  • [42] Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial
    Hang Min Chia
    Peng Chiong Tan
    Sze Ping Tan
    Mukhri Hamdan
    Siti Zawiah Omar
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [43] Sequential Versus Concurrent Use of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    El Sharkwy I.A.E.
    Noureldin E.H.
    Mohamed E.A.E.
    Shazly S.A.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (5) : 408 - 413
  • [44] Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every three hours in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
    Yunesh, Krishnan
    Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad
    Wong, Thai Ying
    Gan, Farah
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (02)
  • [45] Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial
    Kamarudzman, Nadiah
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    Gan, Farah
    Hong, Jesrine
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (11)
  • [46] A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial
    Haas, David M.
    Daggy, Joanne
    Flannery, Kathleen M.
    Dorr, Meredith L.
    Bonsack, Carrie
    Bhamidipalli, Surya S.
    Pierson, Rebecca C.
    Lathrop, Anthony
    Towns, Rachel
    Ngo, Nicole
    Head, Annette
    Morgan, Sarah
    Quinney, Sara K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (03) : 259.e1 - 259.e16
  • [47] Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios
    Shechter-Maor, G.
    Haran, G.
    Sadeh-Mestechkin, D.
    Ganor-Paz, Y.
    Fejgin, M. D.
    Biron-Shental, T.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 35 (02) : 95 - 98
  • [48] Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial
    Yogamoorthy, Usha
    Saaid, Rahmah
    Gan, Farah
    Hong, Jesrine
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (11)
  • [49] Digital insertion of Foley catheter 16F versus 22F versus 28F in unripe cervix labor induction: A randomized trial
    Lim, Boon K.
    Zakaria, Rohaida
    Hong, Jesrine G. S.
    Omar, Siti Z.
    Sulaiman, Sofiah
    Tan, Peng C.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (03) : 694 - 702
  • [50] Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
    Devillard, Eric
    Petillon, Fanny
    Rouzaire, Marion
    Pereira, Bruno
    Accoceberry, Marie
    Houlle, Celine
    Dejou-Bouillet, Lydie
    Bouchet, Pamela
    Delabaere, Amelie
    Gallot, Denis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)